From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] s390/bpf: use 32-bit index for tail calls
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:18:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812161807.1400-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
"p runtime/jit: pass > 32bit index to tail_call" fails when
bpf_jit_enable=1, because the tail call is not executed.
This in turn is because the generated code assumes index is 64-bit,
while it must be 32-bit, and as a result prog array bounds check fails,
while it should pass. Even if bounds check would have passed, the code
that follows uses 64-bit index to compute prog array offset.
Fix by using clrj instead of clgrj for comparing index with array size,
and also by using llgfr for truncating index to 32 bits before using it
to compute prog array offset.
Fixes: 6651ee070b31 ("s390/bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 6299156f9738..955eb355c2fd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1049,8 +1049,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
/* llgf %w1,map.max_entries(%b2) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0016, REG_W1, REG_0, BPF_REG_2,
offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries));
- /* clgrj %b3,%w1,0xa,label0: if %b3 >= %w1 goto out */
- EMIT6_PCREL_LABEL(0xec000000, 0x0065, BPF_REG_3,
+ /* clrj %b3,%w1,0xa,label0: if (u32)%b3 >= (u32)%w1 goto out */
+ EMIT6_PCREL_LABEL(0xec000000, 0x0077, BPF_REG_3,
REG_W1, 0, 0xa);
/*
@@ -1076,8 +1076,10 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
* goto out;
*/
- /* sllg %r1,%b3,3: %r1 = index * 8 */
- EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x000d, REG_1, BPF_REG_3, REG_0, 3);
+ /* llgfr %r1,%b3: %r1 = (u32) index */
+ EMIT4(0xb9160000, REG_1, BPF_REG_3);
+ /* sllg %r1,%r1,3: %r1 *= 8 */
+ EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x000d, REG_1, REG_1, REG_0, 3);
/* lg %r1,prog(%b2,%r1) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, REG_1, BPF_REG_2,
REG_1, offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs));
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-12 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-12 16:18 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2019-08-13 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf] s390/bpf: use 32-bit index for tail calls Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190812161807.1400-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.