All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/17] mvpp2: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:51:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812195125.GA22367@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkWzr5fu3v0KR2XXj0dqCZki=JOoMft9SMjs+XmZ8HpUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:44:36PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:01 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:55:51AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 3:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > > > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > > > never do something different based on this.
> > >
> > > Maybe adding this recommendation to the comment block above the
> > > definition of debugfs_create_dir() in fs/debugfs/inode.c would help
> > > prevent this issue in the future?  What failure means, and how to
> > > proceed can be tricky; more documentation can only help in this
> > > regard.
> >
> > If it was there, would you have read it?  :)
> 
> Absolutely; I went looking for it, which is why I haven't added my
> reviewed by tag, because it's not clear from the existing comment
> block how callers should handle the return value, particularly as you
> describe in this commit's commit message.

Ok, fair enough, I'll update the documentation soon, thanks.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-10 10:17 [PATCH v3 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] wimax: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] bonding: no need to print a message if debugfs_create_dir() fails Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] mlx5: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] xgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] bnxt: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] cxgb4: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] hns3: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] nfp: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] stmmac: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] dpaa2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] qca: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-13  9:21   ` Stefan Wahren
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] skge: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] mvpp2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 17:55   ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-12 19:01     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 19:44       ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-12 19:51         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 14/17] fm10k: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 15:46   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-12 15:46     ` Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 15/17] i40e: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 15:48   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-12 15:48     ` Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 16/17] ixgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 10:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 15:49   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-12 15:49     ` Jeff Kirsher
2019-08-10 10:17 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] ieee802154: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-10 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190812195125.GA22367@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhuck@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.