From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix "bind{4,6} deny specific IP & port" on s390
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:21:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813162118.17957-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
"bind4 allow specific IP & port" and "bind6 deny specific IP & port"
fail on s390 because of endianness issue: the 4 IP address bytes are
loaded as a word and compared with a constant, but the value of this
constant should be different on big- and little- endian machines, which
is not the case right now.
Use __constant_ntohl to generate proper value based on machine
endianness.
Fixes: 1d436885b23b ("selftests/bpf: Selftest for sys_bind post-hooks.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index fb679ac3d4b0..5c092a85125f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
@@ -232,7 +233,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip6[3])),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x01000000, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __constant_ntohl(0x00000001), 4),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x2001, 2),
@@ -261,7 +263,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x0100007F, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 16:21 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2019-08-13 19:53 ` [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix "bind{4,6} deny specific IP & port" on s390 Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190813162118.17957-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.