All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change formatting of the condenced output
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:07:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814170748.GK2820@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJk=qSLR1A=1poPY85wNqiye3dMvXZOZ+1OFZSA78VARg@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:47 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > This makes it visually simpler to follow the output.
> > Also, highlight with red color failures when outputting to tty.
> >
> > Before:
> >   #1 attach_probe:FAIL
> >   #2 bpf_obj_id:OK
> >   #3/1 bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o:OK
> >   #3/2 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o:OK
> >   #3/3 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o:OK
> >   #3/4 bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o:OK
> >   #3/5 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o:OK
> >   #3/6 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o:OK
> >   #3/7 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o:OK
> >   #3/8 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o:OK
> >   #3/9 bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o:OK
> >   #3/10 bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o:OK
> >   #3/11 bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o:OK
> >   #3/12 bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o:OK
> >   #3/13 bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o:OK
> >   #3/14 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o:OK
> >   #3/15 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o:OK
> >   #3/16 bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o:OK
> >   #3/17 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o:OK
> >   #3/18 bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o:OK
> >   #3/19 bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o:OK
> >   #3/20 bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o:OK
> >   #3 bpf_verif_scale:OK
> >   #4 flow_dissector:OK
> >
> > After:
> >   #  1     FAIL attach_probe
> >   #  2       OK bpf_obj_id
> >   #  3/1     OK bpf_verif_scale:loop3.o
> >   #  3/2     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale1.o
> >   #  3/3     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale2.o
> >   #  3/4     OK bpf_verif_scale:test_verif_scale3.o
> >   #  3/5     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf50.o
> >   #  3/6     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf100.o
> >   #  3/7     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf180.o
> >   #  3/8     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600.o
> >   #  3/9     OK bpf_verif_scale:pyperf600_nounroll.o
> >   #  3/10    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop1.o
> >   #  3/11    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop2.o
> >   #  3/12    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop4.o
> >   #  3/13    OK bpf_verif_scale:loop5.o
> >   #  3/14    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta.o
> >   #  3/15    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll1.o
> >   #  3/16    OK bpf_verif_scale:strobemeta_nounroll2.o
> >   #  3/17    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop1.o
> >   #  3/18    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_sysctl_loop2.o
> >   #  3/19    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_xdp_loop.o
> >   #  3/20    OK bpf_verif_scale:test_seg6_loop.o
> >   #  3       OK bpf_verif_scale
> >   #  4       OK flow_dissector
> 
> sorry this is nack.
> I prefer consistency with test_verifier output.
No problem, let me know how you feel about the other patches
in the series, can drop this one.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: misc fixes Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change formatting of the condenced output Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 17:00   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-14 17:07     ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: test__skip Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 19:30     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 19:53       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 20:01         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-16  5:16           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-16  5:23             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: remove global fail/success counts Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 20:07     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 20:22       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: remove asserts from subtests Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:52   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190814170748.GK2820@mini-arch \
    --to=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.