From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:42:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814224205.GC69375@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814194841.GA588936@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:48:41PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Joel.
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 06:11:09PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > list_for_each_entry_rcu now has support to check for RCU reader sections
> > as well as lock. Just use the support in it, instead of explicitly
> > checking in the caller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
> > #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
> > - list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \
> > - if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \
> > - else
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \
> > + lock_is_held(&(wq->mutex).dep_map))
>
> Why not lockdep_is_held() tho?
Yes, that's better.
thanks,
- Joel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-11 22:11 [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-12 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 20:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-12 5:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 13:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 18:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-12 20:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-11 22:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2) Joel Fernandes
2019-08-14 19:48 ` Tejun Heo
2019-08-14 22:42 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190814224205.GC69375@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.