All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c/busses: Add i2c-icy for I2C on m68k/Amiga
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:48:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815114809.GA1916@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <276714fb-6b3a-1e99-0744-bfd037305724@enpas.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --]


> Well, the other option is to remove it, and then add it back once
> somebody complains - which is unlikely to happen. The clock parameter
> is PCF8584 specific anyway, and  I think removing it is a good option,

My suggestion is to do that incrementally. First, get your driver
accepted. Second, do the cleanups which affect elektor as well later.

> as I've done the same with getown() (where in i2c-elektor, 'own' sets
> the PCF8584's own address).

I wondered about that. Can the PCF8584 really act as a slave, too?
Somewhen I need to check its datasheet.

> Question is, if I remove the parameter, I'd like it to be
> non-destructive. Do you know of anything that can go wrong if the I2C
> master is running the bus on a wrong clock?

Not sure if I understand you correctly, but if the bus freq is too fast
then devices won't respond. Too slow is not a problem.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-12 23:52 [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c/busses: Add i2c-icy for I2C on m68k/Amiga Max Staudt
2019-08-12 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] i2c/busses/i2c-icy: Add LTC2990 present on 2019 board revision Max Staudt
2019-08-13  7:03   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13  9:49     ` Max Staudt
2019-08-14 19:52       ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-12 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hwmon/ltc2990: Add platform_data support Max Staudt
2019-08-13  6:59   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13  8:02   ` Guenter Roeck
2019-08-13  8:27     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13 13:27       ` Guenter Roeck
2019-08-13 13:32         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13 10:10     ` Max Staudt
2019-08-13 13:24       ` Guenter Roeck
2019-08-13 13:31         ` Max
2019-08-14 18:11         ` Max Staudt
2019-08-12 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] i2c/busses/i2c-icy: Add platform_data for LTC2990 Max Staudt
2019-08-13  7:04   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13  7:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c/busses: Add i2c-icy for I2C on m68k/Amiga Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-13  9:50   ` Max Staudt
2019-08-14 19:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-14 22:33   ` Max Staudt
2019-08-15  7:12     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-15 10:00       ` Max Staudt
2019-08-15 11:48         ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-08-15 11:52           ` Max
2019-08-15 12:04             ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-15 12:10               ` Max Staudt
2019-08-15 12:52                 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815114809.GA1916@kunai \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=max@enpas.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.