All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Mamatha Inamdar <mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com,
	shawn@git.icu, tstoyanov@vmware.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Perf: Return error code for perf_session__new function on failure
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:51:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815125109.GF30356@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814092654.7781.81601.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:02:18PM +0530, Mamatha Inamdar wrote:
> This Patch is to return error code of perf_new_session function
> on failure instead of NULL
> ----------------------------------------------
> Test Results:
> 
> Before Fix:
> 
> $ perf c2c report -input
> failed to open nput: No such file or directory
> 
> $ echo $?
> 0
> ------------------------------------------
> After Fix:
> 
> $ ./perf c2c report -input
> failed to open nput: No such file or directory
> 
> $ echo $?
> 254
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mamatha Inamdar <mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c      |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-buildid-cache.c |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-buildid-list.c  |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c           |    6 ++++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-diff.c          |    9 +++++----
>  tools/perf/builtin-evlist.c        |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-inject.c        |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c          |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c           |    9 +++++----
>  tools/perf/builtin-lock.c          |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-mem.c           |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c        |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c        |    4 ++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-sched.c         |   11 ++++++-----
>  tools/perf/builtin-script.c        |    9 +++++----
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c          |   11 ++++++-----
>  tools/perf/builtin-timechart.c     |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-top.c           |    5 +++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c         |    4 ++--
>  tools/perf/util/data-convert-bt.c  |    4 +++-
>  tools/perf/util/session.c          |   13 +++++++++----
>  21 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

I'm getting few conflicts, please rebase to latest Arnaldo's perf/core

patching file builtin-annotate.c
patching file builtin-buildid-cache.c
patching file builtin-buildid-list.c
patching file builtin-c2c.c
patching file builtin-diff.c
patching file builtin-evlist.c
patching file builtin-inject.c
patching file builtin-kmem.c
patching file builtin-kvm.c
patching file builtin-lock.c
patching file builtin-mem.c
patching file builtin-record.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1361 (offset 23 lines).
patching file builtin-report.c
patching file builtin-sched.c
patching file builtin-script.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 3073 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3743 (offset 1 line).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file builtin-script.c.rej
patching file builtin-stat.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 81 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1447 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1646 (offset 1 line).
patching file builtin-timechart.c
patching file builtin-top.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 74 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1668 (offset 25 lines).
patching file builtin-trace.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 3573 (offset 320 lines).
patching file util/data-convert-bt.c
patching file util/session.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 184 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 199 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 222 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 257 (offset 2 lines).

thanks,
jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  9:32 [PATCH]Perf: Return error code for perf_session__new function on failure Mamatha Inamdar
2019-08-15 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-08-15 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-08-15 12:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-08-20  8:39   ` Mamatha Inamdar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815125109.GF30356@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shawn@git.icu \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tstoyanov@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.