All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:18:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815141842.GB20599@google.com> (raw)

list_for_each_entry_rcu now has support to check for RCU reader sections
as well as lock. Just use the support in it, instead of explicitly
checking in the caller.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
v1->v3: Changed lock_is_held() to lockdep_is_held()

 kernel/workqueue.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 601d61150b65..e882477ebf6e 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
 			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),		\
 			 "RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
 
-#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq)					\
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
-			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex),			\
-			 "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
-
 #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq)			\
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
 			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) &&		\
@@ -425,9 +420,8 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
  * ignored.
  */
 #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)						\
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node)		\
-		if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { }	\
-		else
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node,		\
+				 lockdep_is_held(&(wq->mutex)))
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
 
-- 
2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 14:18 Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2019-08-15 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-15 15:24   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-16 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815141842.GB20599@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.