diff for duplicates of <20190816115750.GA24545@Red>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index bf724b9..296241b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
 > > > > > > The only devicetree difference with current pineH64, is the PHY
 > > > > > > regulator.
 > > > > > >
-> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
+> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
 > > > > > > ---
 > > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile        |  1 +
 > > > > > >  .../sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts        | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
 > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
 > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
 > > > > > > +/*
-> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
+> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
 > > > > > > + */
 > > > > > > +
 > > > > > > +#include "sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts"
@@ -92,9 +92,3 @@ Normal it was added for model A (without any ethernet/HDMI support, so nothing d
 > 
 
 Since model A is not public (only evaluations boards exists), the probability of a production model A is low and the current dtb is perfect for model B , could you reconsider this ?
-
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ac7e076..7cd46f7 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,17 +4,17 @@
  "ref\020190814133322.dawzv3ityakxtqs4@flea\0"
  "ref\020190816093513.GA25042@Red\0"
  "ref\020190816113650.hstbi5ntstx3wh4a@flea\0"
- "From\0Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>\0"
+ "From\0Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: allwinner: Add devicetree for pine H64 modelA evaluation board\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:57:50 +0200\0"
- "To\0Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>\0"
- "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com"
-  devicetree@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
-  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-  wens@csie.org
-  robh+dt@kernel.org
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Maxime Ripard <mripard-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org"
+  robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
+  wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org
+  devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
+  linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
+  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
+ " linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:\n"
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
  "> > > > > > The only devicetree difference with current pineH64, is the PHY\n"
  "> > > > > > regulator.\n"
  "> > > > > >\n"
- "> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>\n"
+ "> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\n"
  "> > > > > > ---\n"
  "> > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile        |  1 +\n"
  "> > > > > >  .../sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts        | 26 +++++++++++++++++++\n"
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
  "> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@\n"
  "> > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)\n"
  "> > > > > > +/*\n"
- "> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>\n"
+ "> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\n"
  "> > > > > > + */\n"
  "> > > > > > +\n"
  "> > > > > > +#include \"sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts\"\n"
@@ -110,12 +110,6 @@
  "> I'd prefer not to hack anything, but yes\n"
  "> \n"
  "\n"
- "Since model A is not public (only evaluations boards exists), the probability of a production model A is low and the current dtb is perfect for model B , could you reconsider this ?\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ Since model A is not public (only evaluations boards exists), the probability of a production model A is low and the current dtb is perfect for model B , could you reconsider this ?
 
-97dfb614c22177ba85795f691a5354b07e270c72da4bf64e1b3a64b76fd1ee5f
+87f461b9e9286ce43746474321444e09d0b12977d16d99afc5e12091d6d95194
