diff for duplicates of <20190816123850.GA22923@lst.de>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 823c6a0..f455ac9 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Fri, Aug 16, 2019@01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
+On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
 > Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2019-08-16 13:26:44)
 > > Please, report the actual problem.  Blindly reverting a patch without
 > > even an explanation of your regressions is not the way to do it.
@@ -9,3 +9,7 @@ On Fri, Aug 16, 2019@01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
 > giving the current failed state and the outcome of the patch.
 
 Platform type, SSD vendor and type, firmware version?
+_______________________________________________
+Intel-gfx mailing list
+Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
+https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 1155992..5b83df8 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,12 +1,21 @@
  "ref\020190816121549.8754-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk\0"
  "ref\020190816122644.GA21797@lst.de\0"
  "ref\0156595862897.11610.6852982219615959799@skylake-alporthouse-com\0"
- "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] Revert \"nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend\"\0"
+ "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] Revert \"nvme-pci: use host managed power state for suspend\"\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:38:50 +0200\0"
+ "To\0Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>\0"
+ "Cc\0Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>"
+  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
+  intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
+  Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
+  linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
+  Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
+  Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
+ " Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Fri, Aug 16, 2019@01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:\n"
+ "On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:\n"
  "> Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2019-08-16 13:26:44)\n"
  "> > Please, report the actual problem.  Blindly reverting a patch without\n"
  "> > even an explanation of your regressions is not the way to do it.\n"
@@ -16,6 +25,10 @@
  "> If you would like to wait, you will get test results from our CI\n"
  "> giving the current failed state and the outcome of the patch.\n"
  "\n"
- Platform type, SSD vendor and type, firmware version?
+ "Platform type, SSD vendor and type, firmware version?\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "Intel-gfx mailing list\n"
+ "Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org\n"
+ https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
 
-85579614f955b91cd68529bff4f9c5d28b73180201d063aa3a9e1cab1f2c22e2
+3a0240505e8a7085926d6ef6ecccdaef564c48c5fe3784f69945a66fc3c8924c
