From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6426963680319637830==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [rfc] Motorola Droid 4 voice: integrate into atmodem or completely separate? Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 10:33:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20190818083338.GA23821@amd> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============6426963680319637830== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > >>The send_clcc change does sort of make sense separately. > > > >Yes, you should have it separate in your inbox ;-). If not, let me > >know and I'll resend. > = > Doesn't look like I do? You should have now. :-). I pushed updated sources to https://github.com/pavelmachek/ofono/pull/new/m-v1.29-1 . Now I'm fighting with network registration, and there's problem I don't know how to solve nicely. Regular AT commands behave like this: AT+CREG? +CREG: 0,0 OK Why Droid4 reacts with single line (and no OK) +CREG=3D0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,0 I'm using g_at_chat_add_terminator(chat, "+CREG=3D", 6, TRUE ); so I get my callbacks called, but I can't really get that to work. Is there a better way? Best regards, Pavel -- = (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --===============6426963680319637830== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjEKCmlFWUVBUkVD QUFZRkFsMVpEV0VBQ2drUU1PZndhcFhiK3ZJTjlnQ2dxSDhSeXc0VXFDYmtwdEs5UEUzTHIzZG4K TWd3QW4waEczR3FtV29QMHhQbzlBQTIvZVhnVTM1ZkQKPVVHN0YKLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQIFNJR05B VFVSRS0tLS0tCg== --===============6426963680319637830==--