All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>,
	Linux Stable maillist <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.2.10-rc1-61d06c6.cki (stable)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:55:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190818235546.GA15418@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38430602-3b5e-5217-aeae-13fcd82a9c1f@applied-asynchrony.com>

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>On 8/18/19 10:38 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>>>
>>>>        Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>>>             Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
>>>>
>>>>The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>>>
>>>>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>>>              Merge: OK
>>>>            Compile: OK
>>>>              Tests: FAILED
>>>>
>>>>All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>>>
>>>>   https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>One or more kernel tests failed:
>>>>
>>>>   aarch64:
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>>   ppc64le:
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>>   x86_64:
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>     ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>
>>>Are these all real?
>>>
>>
>>Hi Greg,
>>
>>the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9,
>>so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my
>>own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look
>>like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
>
>The culprit is "exit-make-setting-exit_state-consistent.patch", which was
>successfully added everywhere. This explains why KCI is consistently sad
>everywhere, too. :)
>
>Removing that patch from the queue results in a working kernel (with the
>version updated by me):
>
>$cat /proc/version
>Linux version 5.2.10 (root@ragnarok) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0 p1)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 18 23:50:50 CEST 2019

Are you seeing the same failure with upstream kernel?

--
Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-18 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-18 18:31 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.2.10-rc1-61d06c6.cki (stable) CKI Project
2019-08-18 18:49 ` Greg KH
2019-08-18 20:38   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2019-08-18 21:57     ` Holger Hoffstätte
2019-08-18 23:55       ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-08-19  4:18       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190818235546.GA15418@sasha-vm \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.