From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 5.1.21 Dell 2950 terrible swraid5 I/O performance with swraid on top of Perc 5/i raid0/jbod
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:40:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819164053.GF5431@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5DCAD3D8-07B6-4A5D-A3C1-A1DF4055C5BD@linaro.org>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:18:13AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Solving this kind of problem is one of the goals of the BFQ I/O scheduler [1].
> Have you tried? If you want to, then start by swathing to BFQ in both the
> physical and the virtual block devices in your stack.
I sure was not aware of it, thank you for pointing it out.
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> [1] https://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/BFQ/
I did the following below and when the swraid is rebuilding, I'm still
getting terrible overall throughput:
newmagic:~# hdparm -t /dev/md2
/dev/md2:
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Timing buffered disk reads: 2 MB in 5.76 seconds = 355.42 kB/sec
I think things hang a bit less, which I suppose it good, but the system is
still unusable overall.
newmagic:~# modprobe bfq
newmagic:~# for i in /sys/block/*/queue/scheduler; do echo $i; echo bfq > $i; cat $i; done
/sys/block/bcache0/queue/scheduler
none
/sys/block/md0/queue/scheduler
none
/sys/block/md1/queue/scheduler
none
/sys/block/md2/queue/scheduler
none
/sys/block/md3/queue/scheduler
none
/sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdd/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sde/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdf/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdg/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdh/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sdi/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
/sys/block/sr0/queue/scheduler
[bfq] none
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 7:08 5.1.21 Dell 2950 terrible swraid5 I/O performance with swraid on top of Perc 5/i raid0/jbod Marc MERLIN
2019-08-19 9:18 ` Paolo Valente
2019-08-19 12:02 ` Paolo Valente
2019-08-19 16:40 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2019-08-19 17:05 ` Paolo Valente
2019-08-19 17:26 ` Marc MERLIN
2019-08-19 11:42 ` o1bigtenor
2019-08-19 16:24 ` Marc MERLIN
2019-08-20 5:49 ` Marc MERLIN
2019-08-19 18:37 ` Roman Mamedov
2019-08-19 19:16 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190819164053.GF5431@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.