All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 0/6] s390x/mmu: Storage key reference and change bit handling
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:37:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190819183713.7d0016fa.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819183623.3afe92c4.cohuck@redhat.com>

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:36:23 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:23:49 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The first two patches are modified patches from:
> >     [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 0/9] s390x: MMU changes and extensions
> > 
> > This series primarily fixes minor things in the storage key handling code
> > in the MMU and implements fairly reliable reference and change bit handling
> > for TCG. To track the reference and change bit, we have to invalidate
> > TLB entries whenever the storage key is changed by the guest and make sure
> > not TLB entry is writable in case the storage key does not indicate a
> > change already.
> > 
> > With this series, the kvm-unit-test "skey" now passes. \o/
> > 
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - "s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches"
> > -- Cleanup return value handling
> > - Added RB's
> > 
> > David Hildenbrand (6):
> >   s390x/mmu: ASC selection in s390_cpu_get_phys_page_debug()
> >   s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches
> >   s390x/tcg: Flush the TLB of all CPUs on SSKE and RRBE
> >   s390x/mmu: Trace the right value if setting/getting the storage key
> >     fails
> >   s390x/mmu: Better storage key reference and change bit handling
> >   s390x/mmu: Factor out storage key handling
> > 
> >  target/s390x/cpu.h        |   7 ++
> >  target/s390x/helper.c     |   5 ++
> >  target/s390x/mem_helper.c |   4 ++
> >  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> >   
> 
> Thanks, applied.

No, not that one, v3. Argh.


      reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  7:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 0/6] s390x/mmu: Storage key reference and change bit handling David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 1/6] s390x/mmu: ASC selection in s390_cpu_get_phys_page_debug() David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 2/6] s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14 17:44   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-15 15:43   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-08-15 16:52     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 3/6] s390x/tcg: Flush the TLB of all CPUs on SSKE and RRBE David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14 10:06   ` Alex Bennée
2019-08-14 10:21     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14 10:44       ` Alex Bennée
2019-08-14 10:51         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 4/6] s390x/mmu: Trace the right value if setting/getting the storage key fails David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14 17:50   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-15 15:39     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 5/6] s390x/mmu: Better storage key reference and change bit handling David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14  7:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 6/6] s390x/mmu: Factor out storage key handling David Hildenbrand
2019-08-14 18:01   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-14 18:18     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 16:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v2 0/6] s390x/mmu: Storage key reference and change bit handling Cornelia Huck
2019-08-19 16:37   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190819183713.7d0016fa.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.