From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Return 0 when !CONFIG_INTEL_SGX_DRIVER
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:31:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822003122.GN29345@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822002940.hb7xjbrdkxxx4zoe@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 03:29:40AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:24:00AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > How does the current code not align with this approach? The core subsystem
> > should tear itself down if loading the driver fails, which includes failing
> > because it doesn't exist.
>
> I get now the real issue that you are trying to point out (did not
> earlier). Still, I think your approach to fix it needs some
> reconsideration.
>
> Something that *does not exist* can never fail. That should be dead
> obvious.
>
> If the SGX driver does not exit and KVM does not have SGX support
> compiled in, then the only logical conclusion that you can end up with
> is that neither the SGX core should exist in vmlinux in the first place.
>
> This all summarizes to that I have to remove the INTEL_SGX_DRIVER
> kconfig flag. Its existence can only be considered when there >= 2
> in-kernel users for SGX.
That works too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-14 14:32 [PATCH] x86/sgx: Return 0 when !CONFIG_INTEL_SGX_DRIVER Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-15 9:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-07-15 13:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-01 16:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-01 16:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-02 19:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-13 1:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15 21:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-21 17:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-22 0:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-22 0:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-08-22 14:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-08-22 1:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822003122.GN29345@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.