From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:17:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822021740.15554-6-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822021740.15554-1-riel@surriel.com>
Reducing the overhead of the CPU controller is achieved by not walking
all the sched_entities every time a task is enqueued or dequeued.
One of the things being checked every single time is whether the cfs_rq
is on the rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
By only removing a cfs_rq from the list once it no longer has children
on the list, we can avoid walking the sched_entity hierarchy if the bottom
cfs_rq is on the list, once the runqueues have been flattened.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a48d0dbfc232..04b216234265 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -369,6 +369,39 @@ static inline void assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(struct rq *rq)
SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
}
+/*
+ * Because list_add_leaf_cfs_rq always places a child cfs_rq on the list
+ * immediately before a parent cfs_rq, and cfs_rqs are removed from the list
+ * bottom-up, we only have to test whether the cfs_rq before us on the list
+ * is our child.
+ */
+static inline bool child_cfs_rq_on_list(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct cfs_rq *prev_cfs_rq;
+ struct list_head *prev;
+
+ prev = cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.prev;
+ prev_cfs_rq = container_of(prev, struct cfs_rq, leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+
+ return (prev_cfs_rq->tg->parent == cfs_rq->tg);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remove a cfs_rq from the list if it has no children on the list.
+ * The scheduler iterates over the list regularly; if conditions for
+ * removal are still true, we'll get to this cfs_rq in the future.
+ */
+static inline void list_del_leaf_cfs_rq_bottom(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ if (!cfs_rq->on_list)
+ return;
+
+ if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
+ return;
+
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+}
+
/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */
#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(rq, cfs_rq, pos) \
list_for_each_entry_safe(cfs_rq, pos, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, \
@@ -7723,7 +7756,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
* decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list.
*/
if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
- list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ list_del_leaf_cfs_rq_bottom(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 2:17 [PATCH RFC v4 0/15] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-08-23 18:13 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-24 0:05 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 13:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-28 14:47 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 15:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2019-08-28 14:09 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up Vincent Guittot
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 13:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-28 15:28 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 16:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 07/15] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 16:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 08/15] sched,fair: simplify timeslice length code Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 17:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-28 23:18 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-29 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-29 16:00 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-30 6:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-30 15:01 ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-02 7:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-02 17:47 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 09/15] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-03 15:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-09-03 20:27 ` Rik van Riel
2019-09-04 6:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched,fair: add helper functions for flattened runqueue Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-08-23 18:14 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-24 1:16 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched,fair: flatten update_curr functionality Rik van Riel
2019-08-27 10:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched,fair: propagate sum_exec_runtime up the hierarchy Rik van Riel
2019-08-28 7:51 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-28 13:14 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-29 17:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-29 18:06 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched,fair: ramp up task_se_h_weight quickly Rik van Riel
2019-08-22 2:17 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched,fair: scale vdiff in wakeup_preempt_entity Rik van Riel
2019-09-02 10:53 ` [PATCH RFC v4 0/15] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Dietmar Eggemann
2019-09-03 1:44 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-06 19:12 [PATCH RFC v5 " Rik van Riel
2019-09-06 19:12 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched,fair: remove cfs_rqs from leaf_cfs_rq_list bottom up Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822021740.15554-6-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.