From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt76: remove empty flag in mt76_txq_schedule_list
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:37:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822123757.GA28300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822115052.GC3350@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:49:10AM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Remove empty flag in mt76_txq_schedule_list and mt76_txq_send_burst
> > > since we just need retry_q length to notify mac80211 to reschedule the
> > > current tx queue
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 23 +++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> > > index d7982aa83c11..51d69329ed06 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
> > > @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_release_buffered_frames);
> > >
> > > static int
> > > mt76_txq_send_burst(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_sw_queue *sq,
> > > - struct mt76_txq *mtxq, bool *empty)
> > > + struct mt76_txq *mtxq)
> > > {
> > > struct ieee80211_txq *txq = mtxq_to_txq(mtxq);
> > > enum mt76_txq_id qid = mt76_txq_get_qid(txq);
> > > @@ -392,16 +392,12 @@ mt76_txq_send_burst(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_sw_queue *sq,
> > > bool probe;
> > > int idx;
> > >
> > > - if (test_bit(MT_WCID_FLAG_PS, &wcid->flags)) {
> > > - *empty = true;
> > > + if (test_bit(MT_WCID_FLAG_PS, &wcid->flags))
> > > return 0;
> >
> > This changes behaviour for station in PS state. If retry_q is not
> > empty, now we will be rescheduling tx queue for STA in PS mode.
> > Not sure if this is problem or not, though.
>
> good point..looking at the code it seems not a issue since we will not actually
> tx frames for PS stations. What do you think?
I do not see how changing this could possibly break things, but it
was explicitly added by below commit, with changelog sugesting it is
needed:
commit d225581df3147060bc99e931b11f7cf2dcb1b2ca
Author: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:33:38 2019 +0100
mt76: avoid scheduling tx queues for powersave stations
In case a tx queue wake call arrives after a client has transitioned to
powersave, make sure that the queue is not kept active until the client
has left powersave mode
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 9:49 [PATCH] mt76: remove empty flag in mt76_txq_schedule_list Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-08-22 10:36 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-22 11:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-08-22 12:37 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2019-08-22 12:44 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822123757.GA28300@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.