From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] genirq/affinity: Improve __irq_build_affinity_masks()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:03:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822160311.GA15264@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190819124937.9948-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 05:49:36AM -0700, Ming Lei wrote:
> One invariant of __irq_build_affinity_masks() is that all CPUs in the
> specified masks( cpu_mask AND node_to_cpumask for each node) should be
> covered during the spread. Even though all requested vectors have been
> reached, we still need to spread vectors among remained CPUs. The similar
> policy has been taken in case of 'numvecs <= nodes' already:
>
> So remove the following check inside the loop:
>
> if (done >= numvecs)
> break;
>
> Meantime assign at least 1 vector for remained nodes if 'numvecs' vectors
> have been handled already.
>
> Also, if the specified cpumask for one numa node is empty, simply not
> spread vectors on this node.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
> Cc: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index 6fef48033f96..c7cca942bd8a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -129,14 +129,26 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> unsigned int ncpus, v, vecs_to_assign, vecs_per_node;
>
> - /* Spread the vectors per node */
> - vecs_per_node = (numvecs - (curvec - firstvec)) / nodes;
> -
> /* Get the cpus on this node which are in the mask */
> cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
> -
> - /* Calculate the number of cpus per vector */
> ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
> + if (!ncpus)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the number of cpus per vector
> + *
> + * Spread the vectors evenly per node. If the requested
> + * vector number has been reached, simply allocate one
> + * vector for each remaining node so that all nodes can
> + * be covered
> + */
> + if (numvecs > done)
> + vecs_per_node = max_t(unsigned,
> + (numvecs - done) / nodes, 1);
> + else
> + vecs_per_node = 1;
> +
> vecs_to_assign = min(vecs_per_node, ncpus);
>
> /* Account for rounding errors */
> @@ -156,13 +168,11 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> }
>
> done += v;
> - if (done >= numvecs)
> - break;
> if (curvec >= last_affv)
> curvec = firstvec;
> --nodes;
> }
> - return done;
> + return done < numvecs ? done : numvecs;
> }
>
> /*
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 12:49 [PATCH V6 0/2] genriq/affinity: Make vectors allocation fair Ming Lei
2019-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH V6 1/2] genirq/affinity: Improve __irq_build_affinity_masks() Ming Lei
2019-08-22 16:03 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-08-22 16:36 ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-08-19 12:49 ` [PATCH V6 2/2] genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr_cpu ratio Ming Lei
2019-08-19 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-19 13:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-19 14:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-22 3:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-22 16:03 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-22 16:36 ` Derrick, Jonathan
2019-08-25 8:02 ` [PATCH V6 0/2] genriq/affinity: Make vectors allocation fair Ming Lei
2019-08-25 9:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822160311.GA15264@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.