All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ib_umem_get and DMA_API_DEBUG question
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:00:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190827120011.GA7149@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bae7550-35cf-b183-1e1c-fd1f8e01ef79@amazon.com>

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:28:20AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 26/08/2019 17:05, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Lately I've been seeing DMA-API call traces on our automated testing runs which
> > complain about overlapping mappings of the same cacheline [1].
> > The problem is (most likely) caused due to multiple calls to ibv_reg_mr with the
> > same address, which as a result DMA maps the same physical addresses more than 7
> > (ACTIVE_CACHELINE_MAX_OVERLAP) times.
> 
> BTW, on rare occasions I'm seeing the boundary check in check_sg_segment [1]
> fail as well. I don't have a stable repro for it though.
> 
> Is this a known issue as well? The comment there states it might be a bug in the
> DMA API implementation, but I'm not sure.
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3-rc3/source/kernel/dma/debug.c#L1230

Maybe we are missing a dma_set_seg_boundary ?

PCI uses low defaults:

	dma_set_max_seg_size(&dev->dev, 65536);
	dma_set_seg_boundary(&dev->dev, 0xffffffff);

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 14:05 ib_umem_get and DMA_API_DEBUG question Gal Pressman
2019-08-26 14:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-08-26 14:39   ` Gal Pressman
2019-08-26 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-27  8:28 ` Gal Pressman
2019-08-27 12:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-08-27 12:53     ` Gal Pressman
2019-08-27 13:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-27 13:22         ` Gal Pressman
2019-08-27 13:37           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-27 13:53             ` Gal Pressman
2019-08-28 14:15               ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190827120011.GA7149@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=galpress@amazon.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.