From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: ls1021a-tsn: Use the DSPI controller in poll mode Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:31:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20190827183154.GI23391@sirena.co.uk> References: <20190822211514.19288-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190822211514.19288-6-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190827180502.GF23391@sirena.co.uk> <20190827181318.GG23391@sirena.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gIORF5nGxIt+AP0s" Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, lkml , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo To: Vladimir Oltean Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org --gIORF5nGxIt+AP0s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 09:16:39PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > I can't seem to find any situation where it performs worse. Hence my > question on whether it's a better idea to condition this behavior on a > Kconfig option rather than a DT blob which may or may not be in sync. If it's unconditionally worse then it shouldn't even be a Kconfig option, just make the driver just never use the interrupt. --gIORF5nGxIt+AP0s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl1ldxkACgkQJNaLcl1U h9ARswf6A+M4PLUEgqtq4LS9LU7LpH/qbPKXT1byjJNJOzZJhiaNOdOfiQUXTpHH bipXfDjoA+Bq5QZyp0VX6qO8heo7sSdZzmNKx3wnydsKCGck5e3Ste7Yru5PY2sn r9pdyH1nFG5BSfaxxx4fDzBArcNXJM0fo2lVxpwk4tNuviBMKON55SrJ8maV1Krm 1Tut3wZxZC7UtS5GQE6TDTGpSRSKjEMLNodsZYLRcbh+FimChm5jEHHegB4hLv4b o9+IhSlpp+NHkSCoYN2kQmEEi03g95O4mbHSqonF3mpmM4qXQuGsM8brK+UoRgpe koyv59Xv//Wv79iCrMHH3tiK8FCRKg== =OKu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gIORF5nGxIt+AP0s--