From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Only print persistent reasons for kvm disabled once
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:08:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190827190810.GA21275@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87imqjm8b4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
2019-08-27 08:27+0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov:
> Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> writes:
>
> > When I boot my server I'm treated to a console log with:
> >
> > [ 40.520510] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.551234] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.607987] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.659701] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.691224] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.718786] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.750122] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.797170] kvm: disabled by bios
> > [ 40.828408] kvm: disabled by bios
> >
> > ... many, many more lines, one for every logical CPU
>
> (If I didn't miss anything) we have the following code:
>
> __init vmx_init()
> kvm_init();
> kvm_arch_init()
>
> and we bail on first error so there should be only 1 message per module
> load attempt. The question I have is who (and why) is trying to load
> kvm-intel (or kvm-amd which is not any different) for each CPU? Is it
> udev? Can this be changed?
I agree that this is a highly suspicious behavior.
It would be really helpful if we found out what is causing it.
So far, this patch seems to be working around a userspace bug.
> In particular, I'm worried about eVMCS enablement in vmx_init(), we will
> also get a bunch of "KVM: vmx: using Hyper-V Enlightened VMCS" messages
> if the consequent kvm_arch_init() fails.
And we can't get rid of this through the printk_once trick, because this
code lives in kvm_intel module and therefore gets unloaded on every
failure.
I am also not inclined to apply the patch as we will likely merge the
kvm and kvm_{svm,intel} modules in the future to take full advantage of
link time optimizations and this patch would stop working after that.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-26 18:23 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Only print persistent reasons for kvm disabled once Tony Luck
2019-08-27 6:27 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-27 17:50 ` Luck, Tony
2019-08-27 19:08 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2019-08-27 19:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-11 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190827190810.GA21275@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.