From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A1FC3A59B for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C493823774 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:27:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C493823774 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9857889C; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F24A7F6 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:26:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E898D709 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1340B227A8A; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:26:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Lu Baolu Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device Message-ID: <20190902072651.GA28587@lst.de> References: <20190830071718.16613-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830071718.16613-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830073130.GA10471@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: alan.cox@intel.com, Christoph Hellwig , Stefano Stabellini , ashok.raj@intel.com, Jonathan Corbet , pengfei.xu@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , David Woodhouse , kevin.tian@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Steven Rostedt , Bjorn Helgaas , Boris Ostrovsky , mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Juergen Gross , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, Robin Murphy X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 09:58:27AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > The untrusted flag is introduced in another series. I agree that we > could consider to move it to struct device, but I think making it > in a separated patch looks better. A separate patch is of course a good idea. But it needs to happen before we can use the flag in the swiotlb code. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F51C3A59B for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6530523774 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 07:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729672AbfIBH06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 03:26:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47663 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729404AbfIBH06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 03:26:58 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1340B227A8A; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:26:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Lu Baolu Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Woodhouse , Joerg Roedel , Bjorn Helgaas , ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , pengfei.xu@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Jonathan Corbet , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Steven Rostedt , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device Message-ID: <20190902072651.GA28587@lst.de> References: <20190830071718.16613-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830071718.16613-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830073130.GA10471@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 09:58:27AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > The untrusted flag is introduced in another series. I agree that we > could consider to move it to struct device, but I think making it > in a separated patch looks better. A separate patch is of course a good idea. But it needs to happen before we can use the flag in the swiotlb code.