All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: tegra: Parameterize mailbox register addresses
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:58:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903135822.GA10466@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902082127.17963-1-jckuo@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:21:27PM +0800, JC Kuo wrote:
> Tegra194 XUSB host controller has rearranged mailbox registers. This
> commit makes mailbox registers address a part of "soc" data so that
> xhci-tegra driver can be used for Tegra194.
> 
> Signed-off-by: JC Kuo <jckuo@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> index dafc65911fc0..247b08ca49ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-tegra.c
> @@ -42,19 +42,18 @@
>  #define XUSB_CFG_CSB_BASE_ADDR			0x800
>  
>  /* FPCI mailbox registers */
> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD			0x0e4
> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD */
>  #define  MBOX_DEST_FALC				BIT(27)
>  #define  MBOX_DEST_PME				BIT(28)
>  #define  MBOX_DEST_SMI				BIT(29)
>  #define  MBOX_DEST_XHCI				BIT(30)
>  #define  MBOX_INT_EN				BIT(31)
> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN		0x0e8
> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN and XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT */
>  #define  CMD_DATA_SHIFT				0
>  #define  CMD_DATA_MASK				0xffffff
>  #define  CMD_TYPE_SHIFT				24
>  #define  CMD_TYPE_MASK				0xff
> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT		0x0ec
> -#define XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER			0x0f0
> +/* XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER */
>  #define  MBOX_OWNER_NONE			0
>  #define  MBOX_OWNER_FW				1
>  #define  MBOX_OWNER_SW				2
> @@ -146,6 +145,13 @@ struct tegra_xusb_phy_type {
>  	unsigned int num;
>  };
>  
> +struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs {
> +	unsigned int cmd;
> +	unsigned int data_in;
> +	unsigned int data_out;
> +	unsigned int owner;

Shouldn't these all be u8 values?

> +};
> +
>  struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>  	const char *firmware;
>  	const char * const *supply_names;
> @@ -160,6 +166,8 @@ struct tegra_xusb_soc {
>  		} usb2, ulpi, hsic, usb3;
>  	} ports;
>  
> +	struct tega_xusb_mbox_regs mbox;
> +
>  	bool scale_ss_clock;
>  	bool has_ipfs;
>  };
> @@ -395,15 +403,15 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>  	 * ACK/NAK messages.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_ACK || msg->cmd == MBOX_CMD_NAK)) {
> -		value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +		value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  		if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE) {
>  			dev_err(tegra->dev, "mailbox is busy\n");
>  			return -EBUSY;
>  		}
>  
> -		fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +		fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_SW, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  
> -		value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +		value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  		if (value != MBOX_OWNER_SW) {
>  			dev_err(tegra->dev, "failed to acquire mailbox\n");
>  			return -EBUSY;
> @@ -413,17 +421,17 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>  	}
>  
>  	value = tegra_xusb_mbox_pack(msg);
> -	fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN);
> +	fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.data_in);
>  
> -	value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
> +	value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>  	value |= MBOX_INT_EN | MBOX_DEST_FALC;
> -	fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
> +	fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>  
>  	if (wait_for_idle) {
>  		unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(250);
>  
>  		while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> -			value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +			value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  			if (value == MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>  				break;
>  
> @@ -431,7 +439,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_mbox_send(struct tegra_xusb *tegra,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> -			value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +			value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  
>  		if (value != MBOX_OWNER_NONE)
>  			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> @@ -598,16 +606,16 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_xusb_mbox_thread(int irq, void *data)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tegra->lock);
>  
> -	value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT);
> +	value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.data_out);
>  	tegra_xusb_mbox_unpack(&msg, value);
>  
> -	value = fpci_readl(tegra, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
> +	value = fpci_readl(tegra, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>  	value &= ~MBOX_DEST_SMI;
> -	fpci_writel(tegra, value, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_CMD);
> +	fpci_writel(tegra, value, tegra->soc->mbox.cmd);
>  
>  	/* clear mailbox owner if no ACK/NAK is required */
>  	if (!tegra_xusb_mbox_cmd_requires_ack(msg.cmd))
> -		fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, XUSB_CFG_ARU_MBOX_OWNER);
> +		fpci_writel(tegra, MBOX_OWNER_NONE, tegra->soc->mbox.owner);
>  
>  	tegra_xusb_mbox_handle(tegra, &msg);
>  
> @@ -1365,6 +1373,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra124_soc = {
>  	},
>  	.scale_ss_clock = true,
>  	.has_ipfs = true,
> +	.mbox = {
> +		.cmd = 0xe4,
> +		.data_in = 0xe8,
> +		.data_out = 0xec,
> +		.owner = 0xf0,
> +	},
>  };
>  MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra124/xusb.bin");
>  
> @@ -1397,6 +1411,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra210_soc = {
>  	},
>  	.scale_ss_clock = false,
>  	.has_ipfs = true,
> +	.mbox = {
> +		.cmd = 0xe4,
> +		.data_in = 0xe8,
> +		.data_out = 0xec,
> +		.owner = 0xf0,
> +	},
>  };
>  MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra210/xusb.bin");
>  
> @@ -1422,6 +1442,12 @@ static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra186_soc = {
>  	},
>  	.scale_ss_clock = false,
>  	.has_ipfs = false,
> +	.mbox = {
> +		.cmd = 0xe4,
> +		.data_in = 0xe8,
> +		.data_out = 0xec,
> +		.owner = 0xf0,
> +	},

This did not change any existing functionality, is there a follow-on
patch somewhere that takes advantage of this change to enable different
hardware?  Otherwise this doesn't seem worth it.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-02  8:21 [PATCH] xhci: tegra: Parameterize mailbox register addresses JC Kuo
2019-09-03 13:58 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-09-04  1:43   ` JC Kuo
2019-09-04  5:21     ` Greg KH
2019-09-04  5:43       ` JC Kuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190903135822.GA10466@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jckuo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.