Re: Adding "UAS" protocol line to usb.ids file?

[Nathan Stratton Treadway <vgerlists@nathanst.com>]

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 15:39:33 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 06:01:45PM -0400, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> > I noticed that when I use "lsusb -v" on a UAS-enabled drive enclosure,
> > the bInterfaceProtocol line for #80/0x50 has a "protocol name" label but the
> > one for #98/0x62 does not:
[...]
> > So...I was wondering if there was any particular reason that protocol
> > 98 isn't included in the usb.ids file?
> 
> No one got around to it?  Feel free to submit a patch to the web site
> that handles these to upate it.

Thanks for your reply.  I did look there first, but because the
"Bulk-Only" and "UAS" protocol names seem so similar but the UAS name
hasn't been created for several years now, I started to wonder if there
was a more complicated background story behind the situation.

Anyway, for what it's worth there was a submission for the UAS protocal
name on the USB ID website in 2013 and I submitted another one a couple
weeks ago, but so far both are still showing up as grey (which seems to
indicate that it's still pending approval by "an admin").
  https://usb-ids.gowdy.us/read/UC/08/06/62

I'll see if I can track down contact information for the admin(s) there.

						Nathan