From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix: sched/membarrier: p->mm->membarrier_state racy load
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:11:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904111126.GB24568@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903201135.1494-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
with or without these changes...
Why do membarrier_register_*_expedited() check get_nr_threads() == 1?
This makes no sense to me, atomic_read(mm_users) == 1 should be enough.
And I am not sure I understand membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode().
OK, membarrier_private_expedited() can race with user -> kernel -> user
transition, but we do not care unless both user's above have the same mm?
Shouldn't membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() do
if (current->mm != mm)
return;
at the start to make it more clear and avoid sync_core_before_usermode()
if possible?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 20:11 [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix: sched/membarrier: p->mm->membarrier_state racy load Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-03 20:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Fix: sched/membarrier: private expedited registration check Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-03 20:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix: sched/membarrier: p->mm->membarrier_state racy load Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-03 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-04 15:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 17:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 18:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-06 0:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-03 20:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 15:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-04 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 13:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-03 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-03 20:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 10:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-04 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-04 15:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-04 11:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-09-04 16:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-09-08 13:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904111126.GB24568@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.