From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3110AC3A5A5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE862070C for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:31:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DBE862070C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46PJRJ05FKzDr5T for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:31:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46PJQf45SHzDqjY for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 21:30:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3178868B05; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:30:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:30:24 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Gao Xiang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] erofs: patchset addressing Christoph's comments Message-ID: <20190905113024.GA9314@lst.de> References: <20190901055130.30572-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190904020912.63925-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <52a38cb7-b394-b8a8-7254-aafe47f2caa5@huawei.com> <20190905010328.GA15409@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905010328.GA15409@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Miao Xie , Christoph Hellwig Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:03:54AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Could we submit these patches if these patches look good... > Since I'd like to work based on these patches, it makes a difference > to the current code though... Yes, I'm fine with these patches. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353F0C3A5A5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130352070C for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733090AbfIELa3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:30:29 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48134 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725921AbfIELa3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:30:29 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 3178868B05; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:30:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:30:24 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Gao Xiang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chao Yu , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Miao Xie , Chao Yu , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] erofs: patchset addressing Christoph's comments Message-ID: <20190905113024.GA9314@lst.de> References: <20190901055130.30572-1-hsiangkao@aol.com> <20190904020912.63925-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com> <52a38cb7-b394-b8a8-7254-aafe47f2caa5@huawei.com> <20190905010328.GA15409@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905010328.GA15409@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:03:54AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Could we submit these patches if these patches look good... > Since I'd like to work based on these patches, it makes a difference > to the current code though... Yes, I'm fine with these patches.