From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:26:46 -0500 From: David Teigland Message-ID: <20190906142646.GD652@redhat.com> References: <20190829143759.GA22659@redhat.com> <9280276f-8601-cfbc-db46-1dcb28f92229@suse.com> <20190903151705.GA30692@redhat.com> <370ba3fa-53df-7213-8876-d37ef1a3b57e@suse.com> <20190905165519.GB30473@redhat.com> <8b432efdabc3de82146ea6cb87b27c89556bf72e.camel@suse.de> <4552ae36-09fc-9145-d768-80b4ef572bca@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4552ae36-09fc-9145-d768-80b4ef572bca@suse.com> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] system boot time regression when using lvm2-2.03.05 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Heming Zhao Cc: Martin Wilck , LVM general discussion and development On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 08:46:52AM +0000, Heming Zhao wrote: > the _online_pvscan_one cost too much time when booting. The pvscan debug output has timestamps and should show any steps that are slow or delayed somehow.