From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
To: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de>,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] system boot time regression when using lvm2-2.03.05
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:09:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190909140956.GA31823@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e8a6d2-d180-03c6-38ab-a402e813e99d@suse.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:42:17AM +0000, Heming Zhao wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> You are right. Without calling _online_pvscan_one(), the pv/vg/lv won't be actived.
> The activation jobs will be done by systemd calling lvm2-activation-*.services later.
>
> Current code, the boot process is mainly blocked by:
> ```
> _pvscan_aa
> vgchange_activate
> _activate_lvs_in_vg
> sync_local_dev_names
> fs_unlock
> dm_udev_wait <=== this point!
> ```
Thanks for debugging that. With so many devices, one possibility that
comes to mind is this error you would probably have seen:
"Limit for the maximum number of semaphores reached"
> For fix this boot time regression, it looks lvm2 should have a config item in lvm2.conf
> i.e.: large_PV_boot_speedup.
> When this item is 1, pvcan won't call _online_pvscan_one, then let lvm2-activation*.service
> do the active jobs.
> Is it a workable solution?
We should look into fixing the udev problems. I don't mind working around
udev when it won't do what we need; I'm not sure what the options are in
this case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 13:52 [linux-lvm] system boot time regression when using lvm2-2.03.05 Heming Zhao
2019-08-29 14:37 ` David Teigland
2019-09-03 5:02 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-03 15:17 ` David Teigland
2019-09-04 8:13 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-05 12:35 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-05 16:55 ` David Teigland
2019-09-06 4:31 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-06 5:01 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-06 6:51 ` Martin Wilck
2019-09-06 8:46 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-06 14:15 ` David Teigland
2019-09-06 14:26 ` David Teigland
2019-09-06 14:03 ` David Teigland
2019-09-09 11:42 ` Heming Zhao
2019-09-09 14:09 ` David Teigland [this message]
2019-09-10 8:01 ` Martin Wilck
2019-09-10 15:20 ` David Teigland
2019-09-10 20:38 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-09-11 7:17 ` Martin Wilck
2019-09-11 9:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2019-09-12 13:58 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190909140956.GA31823@redhat.com \
--to=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.