From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: Brendan Shanks <bshanks@codeweavers.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:28:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190910062828.GA40888@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7BFFC7D1-6158-4237-AEF9-D10635F054FC@zytor.com>
* hpa@zytor.com <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> I would strongly suggest that we change the term "emulation" to
> "spoofing" for these instructions. We need to explain that we do *not*
> execute these instructions the was the CPU would have, and unlike the
> native instructions do not leak kernel information.
Ok, I've edited the patch to add the 'spoofing' wording where
appropriate, and I also made minor fixes such as consistently
capitalizing instruction names.
Can I also add your Reviewed-by tag?
So the patch should show up in tip:x86/asm today-ish, and barring any
complications is v5.4 material.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-10 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-05 23:22 [PATCH] x86/umip: Add emulation for 64-bit processes Brendan Shanks
2019-09-07 21:26 ` Ricardo Neri
2019-09-08 7:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-09 11:56 ` hpa
2019-09-09 22:34 ` Brendan Shanks
2019-09-09 12:04 ` hpa
2019-09-10 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-09-10 6:32 ` hpa
2019-09-10 6:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Ingo Molnar
2019-09-10 6:41 ` [tip: x86/asm] x86/umip: Add emulation (spoofing) for UMIP covered instructions in 64-bit processes as well tip-bot2 for Brendan Shanks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190910062828.GA40888@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bshanks@codeweavers.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.