From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] net: phylink: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:49:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911094929.GV13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911094619.GN2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:46:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:39:14AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:25:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:08AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> > > > the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
> > > > works with arbitrary firmware node.
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if it's possible to step forward and replace
> > > fwnode_get_gpiod_index by gpiod_get() / gpiod_get_index() here and
> > > in other cases in this series.
> >
> > No, those require a struct device, but we have none. There are network
> > drivers where there is a struct device for the network complex, but only
> > DT nodes for the individual network interfaces. So no, gpiod_* really
> > doesn't work.
>
> In the following patch the node is derived from struct device. So, I believe
> some cases can be handled differently.
phylink is not passed a struct device - it has no knowledge what the
parent device is.
In any case, I do not have "the following patch".
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 7:52 [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 01/11] gpiolib: of: add a fallback for wlf,reset GPIO name Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-12 9:30 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 02/11] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 17:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-12 9:35 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-12 9:48 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-13 18:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 03/11] gpiolib: introduce fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-12 9:50 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 04/11] net: phylink: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 9:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-11 9:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-11 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-11 9:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-09-11 9:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 10:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-11 16:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-11 9:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-12 9:41 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-12 13:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-12 13:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 05/11] net: mdio: " Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: " Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-20 23:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-23 15:03 ` Heikki Krogerus
2019-09-23 16:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 07/11] gpliolib: make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() static Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 08/11] gpiolib: of: tease apart of_find_gpio() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 09/11] gpiolib: of: tease apart acpi_find_gpio() Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 17:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 10/11] gpiolib: consolidate fwnode GPIO lookups Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 7:52 ` [PATCH 11/11] gpiolib: add support for software nodes Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-11 17:13 ` [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib Andy Shevchenko
2019-09-12 9:55 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-12 9:55 ` Linus Walleij
2019-09-17 0:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-17 0:22 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-30 22:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-09-30 22:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-04 21:44 ` Linus Walleij
2019-10-04 21:44 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911094929.GV13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.