From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [v2 4/4] valgrind: disable 256 ptests for aarch64
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:00:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911140016.GB27961@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f87d660d-9c05-dfdd-ced2-88cfc9a38a4f@windriver.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:38:53AM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 9/11/19 8:32 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> > > On qemuarm64 systems, about half of the valgrind tests fail and
> > > often result in defunct processes, eg:
> > > root 819 818 25 00:12 pts/0 00:01:52 /usr/bin/valgrind --command-line-only=yes --memcheck:leak-check=no --tool=memcheck -q --track-origins=
> > > root 861 420 0 00:13 pts/0 00:00:00 [sh] <defunct>
> > > Eventually these processes use so much memory that the
> > > out of memory killer runs.
> > >
> > > Hide the tests that fail as a horrid work-around until the
> > > root cause has been resolved since this at least allows the
> > > ptest run to complete.
> > > ...
> >
> > I can reproduce this on hardware,
>
> Ah good, I was wondering if it was just happening on qemu.
>
> > and I have the bad feeling that no one
> > will work on resolving the root cause if this is work-arounded in ptest.
> >
> > IMHO this should instead be listed as M3 blocker,
> > similar to "strace ptest timeout".
>
> Well, I've enabled 100s of tests that were not being run before
> and most of them pass for qemux86-64 so I don't think it
> should be an M3 blocker like strace since it isn't a regression.
I just tried to reproduce in warrior and it did,
so it doesn't seem to be a regression.
> I did start to debug valgrind but it's a bit of a complicated
> program and will take time so this work-around makes sense to
> me. If no one else gets to it before me, I'll come back to
> debugging this issue but likely not before early 3.1.
It would be good if you could also open a bug, so that people can see
that there is a problem with this package on an important architecture.
> Thanks,
> ../Randy
Thanks
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 21:41 [v2 1/4] valgrind: enable ~500 more ptests Randy MacLeod
2019-09-10 21:41 ` [v2 2/4] valgrind: make a few more ptests pass Randy MacLeod
2019-09-10 21:41 ` [v2 3/4] valgrind: ptest improvements to run-ptest and more Randy MacLeod
2019-09-10 21:41 ` [v2 4/4] valgrind: disable 256 ptests for aarch64 Randy MacLeod
2019-09-11 12:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2019-09-11 13:38 ` Randy MacLeod
2019-09-11 14:00 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2019-09-11 18:01 ` Randy MacLeod
2019-09-12 8:13 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911140016.GB27961@localhost \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.