Re: [PATCH RFC 05/14] dt-bindings/interrupt-controller: pdc: add SPI config register

[Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>]

On Wed, Sep 11 2019 at 04:05 -0600, Linus Walleij wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:47 PM Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> +- qcom,scm-spi-cfg:
>> +       Usage: optional
>> +       Value type: <bool>
>> +       Definition: Specifies if the SPI configuration registers have to be
>> +                   written from the firmware.
>> +
>>  Example:
>>
>>         pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>>                 compatible = "qcom,sdm845-pdc";
>> -               reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>;
>> +               reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>, <0x179900f0 0x60>;
>>                 qcom,pdc-ranges = <0 512 94>, <94 641 15>, <115 662 7>;
>>                 #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>                 interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>>                 interrupt-controller;
>> +               qcom,scm-spi-cfg;
>
>You can probably drop this bool if you just give names to the registers.
>
>Like
>reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>, <0x179900f0 0x60>;
>reg-names = "gic", "pdc";
>
>Then jus check explicitly for a "pdc" register and in that case
>initialize the PDC.
>
Well the address remains the same. The bool defines how to access that
register address - from linux or from the firmware using SCM calls. But
I get your point, I could have different register namess - pdc-linux or
pdc-scm and request by name. I can then use that to determine the mode
for accessing the register.

Thanks,
Lina