From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>,
Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911142106.GA6429@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > This is correctly signed off, but Mike didn't send the patch correctly.
> > It missed a From: line for the proper author, so the patch was committed
> > as if Mike had authored it, which he didn't.
>
> Sorry about that, haven't used the patch system for couple of years now.
> Would you like me to resubmit the patch?
No, I recommitted with the correct author. The patch system takes
standard formatted patches (in the format you'd send to the mailing
lists, complete with the From: header in the first line of the
description, as if you're passing a patch along from someone else)
with the exception of the KernelVersion: header which needs to appear
somewhere before the patch (which can be either body or header.)
>
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Commit
> > >
> > > 2505b9ba9c37 ("ARM: 8904/1: skip nomap memblocks while finding the lowmem/highmem boundary")
> > >
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 14:14 linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-10 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-11 14:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-11 14:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-11 16:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-01-19 1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-19 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-06-03 22:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-07 11:49 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=clin@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.