From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v3 1/5] rcu: Acquire RCU lock when disabling BHs
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:09:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190912220940.GB150506@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911165729.11178-2-swood@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Scott Wood wrote:
> A plain local_bh_disable() is documented as creating an RCU critical
> section, and (at least) rcutorture expects this to be the case. However,
> in_softirq() doesn't block a grace period on PREEMPT_RT, since RCU checks
> preempt_count() directly. Even if RCU were changed to check
> in_softirq(), that wouldn't allow blocked BH disablers to be boosted.
>
> Fix this by calling rcu_read_lock() from local_bh_disable(), and update
> rcu_read_lock_bh_held() accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
thanks,
- Joel
> ---
> v3: Remove change to rcu_read_lock_bh_held(), and move debug portions
> of rcu_read_[un]lock_bh() to separate functions
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> kernel/softirq.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 388ace315f32..9ce7c5006a5e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -600,6 +600,36 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
> rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +/*
> + * On RT, local_bh_disable() calls rcu_read_lock() -- no need to
> + * track it twice.
> + */
> +static inline void rcu_bh_lock_acquire(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline void rcu_bh_lock_release(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void rcu_bh_lock_acquire(void)
> +{
> + __acquire(RCU_BH);
> + rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
> + "rcu_read_lock_bh() used illegally while idle");
> +}
> +
> +static inline void rcu_bh_lock_release(void)
> +{
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
> + "rcu_read_unlock_bh() used illegally while idle");
> + rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> + __release(RCU_BH);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * rcu_read_lock_bh() - mark the beginning of an RCU-bh critical section
> *
> @@ -615,10 +645,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
> static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
> {
> local_bh_disable();
> - __acquire(RCU_BH);
> - rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
> - "rcu_read_lock_bh() used illegally while idle");
> + rcu_bh_lock_acquire();
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -628,10 +655,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
> */
> static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
> {
> - RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
> - "rcu_read_unlock_bh() used illegally while idle");
> - rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> - __release(RCU_BH);
> + rcu_bh_lock_release();
> local_bh_enable();
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index d16d080a74f7..6080c9328df1 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
> long soft_cnt;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
> - if (!in_atomic())
> + if (!in_atomic()) {
> local_lock(bh_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + }
> soft_cnt = this_cpu_inc_return(softirq_counter);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(soft_cnt == 0);
> current->softirq_count += SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET;
> @@ -151,8 +153,10 @@ void _local_bh_enable(void)
> #endif
>
> current->softirq_count -= SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET;
> - if (!in_atomic())
> + if (!in_atomic()) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> local_unlock(bh_lock);
> + }
> }
>
> void _local_bh_enable_rt(void)
> @@ -185,8 +189,10 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(count < 0);
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - if (!in_atomic())
> + if (!in_atomic()) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> local_unlock(bh_lock);
> + }
>
> current->softirq_count -= SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET;
> preempt_check_resched();
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-12 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 16:57 [PATCH RT v3 0/5] RCU fixes Scott Wood
2019-09-11 16:57 ` [PATCH RT v3 1/5] rcu: Acquire RCU lock when disabling BHs Scott Wood
2019-09-12 22:09 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-09-17 7:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 14:06 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-17 14:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 16:12 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-23 16:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-11 16:57 ` [PATCH RT v3 2/5] sched: Rename sleeping_lock to rt_invol_sleep Scott Wood
2019-09-17 7:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-11 16:57 ` [PATCH RT v3 3/5] sched: migrate_dis/enable: Use rt_invol_sleep Scott Wood
2019-09-17 7:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 14:06 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-23 16:59 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-23 17:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-24 11:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-24 13:53 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-24 15:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-24 15:47 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-24 16:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-24 16:35 ` Scott Wood
2019-10-04 16:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-11 16:57 ` [PATCH RT v3 4/5] rcu: Disable use_softirq on PREEMPT_RT Scott Wood
2019-09-12 21:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-12 22:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-17 9:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 14:08 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-11 16:57 ` [PATCH RT v3 5/5] rcutorture: Avoid problematic critical section nesting on RT Scott Wood
2019-09-12 22:17 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-16 16:55 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-17 10:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 14:36 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-17 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-09-17 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2019-09-23 16:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190912220940.GB150506@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=swood@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.