From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5753C4CEC7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EB02084F for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568388082; bh=+6GdpZ0O3YbNJKjrM1giv9kYLtozeTpToDWgbjtGWX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Xk5z3P2MLv7i4uCV7ebnFk4eyI6x9wjAQAPRh649QqUkyBPaRdiflvL0MBiytrU0P uNjU2hkCCdKSl9L9aXBfqnK7250IrUnKjqGRIalipgpqbfatixxSVRHf5rhmFPJNCD efVsHFoRBIv9/V2vormacbG2kiDW97txKOk+pLNE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403910AbfIMPVV (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:21:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48682 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388354AbfIMPVU (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:21:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.45.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 821DB20717; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:21:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568388080; bh=+6GdpZ0O3YbNJKjrM1giv9kYLtozeTpToDWgbjtGWX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mJfj29OEMLko69rdIb/Mnmjca/GGH9fAeRSRzlZsd34LIqyPtSVdsMV2T1zz7a3Un 90LQxOCZoL0njVuVqptkAA/Db5+ieByVY5Uge10RA4AHGuAhwfdx+UJ7ep9bqqrwVL j2cvVHVtyW6F0WLcGH+Bn5aDEWc/4yQUhysJ86Y8= Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:21:17 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Nick Desaulniers , Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Nadav Amit , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , linux-kernel , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()" Message-ID: <20190913152117.GA458892@kroah.com> References: <20190830231527.22304-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20190912221927.18641-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:11:24AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 13/09/2019 00.30, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes > > wrote: > >> > >> Patch 1 has already been picked up by Greg in staging-next, it's > >> included here for completeness. I don't know how to route the rest, or > >> if they should simply wait for 5.5 given how close we are to the merge > >> window for 5.4. > > > > If you want I can pick this up in compiler-attributes and submit it as > > a whole if we get Acks from rtl8723bs/x86/...maintainers. > > Ingo has now acked the x86 parts, and Greg has already picked up the > rtl8723bs patch, which is at least an implicit ack. I'm just unsure of > how and if it will work if you also pick up that one - but, if you > don't, your tree would be (somewhat) dependent on Greg's staging-next :( Feel free to also take that patch through any tree, it's "obviously correct" :) greg k-h