From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 00:59:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190914045928.GN22121@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7af81c39-d31a-1888-e7f3-615fa0eba877@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2146 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 13/09/2019 01:55, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> > Currently, the command:
> >
> > btrfs balance start -dconvert=single,soft .
> >
> > on a Raspberry Pi produces the following kernel message:
> >
> > BTRFS error (device mmcblk0p2): balance: invalid convert data profile single
> >
> > This fails because we use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) to validate
> > the new data profile, the constant for 'single' profile uses bit 48,
> > and there are only 32 bits in a long on ARM.
> >
> > Fix by open-coding the check using u64 variables.
> >
> > Tested by completing the original balance command on several Raspberry
> > Pis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index 88a323a453d8..252c6049c6b7 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -3906,7 +3906,11 @@ static int alloc_profile_is_valid(u64 flags, int extended)
> > return !extended; /* "0" is valid for usual profiles */
> >
> > /* true if exactly one bit set */
> > - return is_power_of_2(flags);
> > + /*
> > + * Don't use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) because it won't work
> > + * for the single profile (1ULL << 48) on 32-bit CPUs.
> > + */
> > + return flags != 0 && (flags & (flags - 1)) == 0;
>
> Would
> flags && IS_ALIGNED(flags)
>
> Work as well? IS_ALIGNED() should be type-save due to the typeof():
> #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
>
> Or maybe I'm missing something subtle?
Wouldn't that be
flags && IS_ALIGNED(flags, flags)
?
> Thanks,
> Johannes
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
> jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5
> 90409 Nürnberg
> Germany
> (HRB 247165, AG München)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-14 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 23:55 [PATCH] btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs Zygo Blaxell
2019-09-13 8:24 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-09-14 4:59 ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2019-09-16 7:44 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-09-13 16:14 ` Josef Bacik
2019-09-14 4:59 ` Zygo Blaxell
2019-09-14 9:20 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-09-23 15:14 ` David Sterba
2019-10-01 17:36 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190914045928.GN22121@hungrycats.org \
--to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.