All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Enable 5-level paging support by default
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:53:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916145305.GA30629@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8435951c-d88a-a5c6-5328-90c9f2521664@intel.com>


* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:

> On 9/13/19 2:54 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > The next major release of distributions expected to have
> > CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y.
> 
> It's probably worth noting that this exposes to two kinds of possible
> performance issues:
> 
> First is the overhead of having the 5-level code on 4-level hardware.
> We haven't seen any regressions there in quite a while.  Kirill talked
> about this in the changelog.
> 
> Second is the overhead of having 5-level paging active on 5-level
> hardware versus using 4-level paging on hardware *capable* of 5-level.
> That is, of course, much harder to measure since 5-level hardware is not
> publicly available.  But, we've tested this quite a bit and we're pretty
> confident that it will not cause regressions, especially on systems
> where apps don't opt in to the larger address space.
> 
> I do think endeavoring to have mainline's defaults match the most common
> distro configs is a good idea, and now is as good of a time as any.
> 
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Ok - in terms of timing it's obviously *way* too late for v5.4, so I've 
queued it up for the v5.5 merge window in tip:x86/mm. This should give it 
2-3 months of additional testing to shake out any weird interactions and 
quirks.

Thanks,

	Ingo


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13  9:54 [PATCH] x86/mm: Enable 5-level paging support by default Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-09-13 18:20 ` Dave Hansen
2019-09-16 14:53   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-09-16 14:54 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190916145305.GA30629@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.