From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git in Outreachy December 2019?
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917120230.GA27531@szeder.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1909171158090.15067@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:23:18PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Also, things like the code tracing via `-x` (which relies on Bash
> functionality in order to work properly,
Not really.
> and which _still_ does not work
> as intended if your test case evaluates a lazy prereq that has not been
> evaluated before
I don't see any striking differences between the trace output of a test
involving a lazy prereq from Bash or dash:
$ cat t9999-test.sh
#!/bin/sh
test_description='test'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_lazy_prereq DUMMY_PREREQ '
: lazily evaluating a dummy prereq
'
test_expect_success DUMMY_PREREQ 'test' '
true
'
test_done
$ ./t9999-test.sh -x
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/.git/
checking prerequisite: DUMMY_PREREQ
mkdir -p "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir" &&
(
cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir" &&
: lazily evaluating a dummy prereq
)
+ mkdir -p /home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/prereq-test-dir
+ cd /home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/prereq-test-dir
+ : lazily evaluating a dummy prereq
prerequisite DUMMY_PREREQ ok
expecting success of 9999.1 'test':
true
+ true
ok 1 - test
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
$ bash ./t9999-test.sh -x
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/.git/
checking prerequisite: DUMMY_PREREQ
mkdir -p "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir" &&
(
cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir" &&
: lazily evaluating a dummy prereq
)
++ mkdir -p '/home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/prereq-test-dir'
++ cd '/home/szeder/src/git/t/trash directory.t9999-test/prereq-test-dir'
++ : lazily evaluating a dummy prereq
prerequisite DUMMY_PREREQ ok
expecting success of 9999.1 'test':
true
++ true
ok 1 - test
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 5:17 Git in Outreachy December 2019? Jeff King
2019-08-31 7:58 ` Christian Couder
2019-08-31 19:44 ` Olga Telezhnaya
2019-09-04 19:41 ` Jeff King
2019-09-05 7:24 ` Christian Couder
2019-09-05 19:39 ` Emily Shaffer
2019-09-06 11:55 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-09-07 6:39 ` Jeff King
2019-09-07 10:13 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-09-07 6:36 ` Jeff King
2019-09-08 14:56 ` Pratyush Yadav
2019-09-09 17:00 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 18:07 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-26 9:47 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-26 19:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-26 21:54 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-26 11:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-13 20:03 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-13 20:51 ` Jeff King
2019-09-16 18:42 ` Emily Shaffer
2019-09-16 21:33 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-16 21:44 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-16 23:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-09-17 0:59 ` Jeff King
2019-09-17 11:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-17 12:02 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2019-09-23 12:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-23 16:58 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-26 11:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-26 13:28 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-26 19:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-26 21:44 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-27 22:18 ` Jeff King
2019-10-09 17:25 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-10-11 6:34 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 18:19 ` Jeff King
2019-09-24 14:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-17 15:10 ` Christian Couder
2019-09-23 12:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-23 19:30 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 18:07 ` Jeff King
2019-09-24 14:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-24 15:33 ` Jeff King
2019-09-28 3:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-24 0:55 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-26 12:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-09-30 8:55 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-28 4:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-20 17:04 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-21 1:47 ` Emily Shaffer
2019-09-23 14:23 ` Christian Couder
2019-09-23 19:40 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 22:29 ` Philip Oakley
2019-10-22 21:16 ` Emily Shaffer
2019-09-23 11:49 ` Christian Couder
2019-09-23 17:58 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-23 19:27 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 20:48 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-23 19:15 ` Jeff King
2019-09-23 20:38 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-23 21:28 ` Jeff King
2019-09-24 17:07 ` Jonathan Tan
2019-09-26 7:09 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190917120230.GA27531@szeder.dev \
--to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.