From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D673C4CEC4 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4029218AF for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727354AbfIROdp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:33:45 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:46072 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727056AbfIROdp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:33:45 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3662 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:33:44 EDT Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1iAa4U-0002PB-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:32:38 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C013FC2797; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:27:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:27:36 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Helge Deller Cc: John David Anglin , Arlie Davis , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bug report (with fix) for DEC Tulip driver (de2104x.c) Message-ID: <20190918132736.GA9231@alpha.franken.de> References: <20190917212844.GJ9591@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 18.09.19 00:51, John David Anglin wrote: > > On 2019-09-17 5:36 p.m., Arlie Davis wrote: > >> Likewise, I'm at a loss for testing with real hardware. It's hard to > >> find such things, now. > > How does de2104x compare to ds2142/43?  I have a c3750 with ds2142/43 tulip.  Helge > > or some others might have a machine with a de2104x. > > The machines we could test are > * a C240 with a DS21140 tulip chip (Sven has one), > * a C3000 or similiar with DS21142 and/or DS21143 (me). > > If the patch does not show any regressions, I'd suggest to > apply it upstream. 2114x chips use a different driver, so it won't help here. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]