From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] s390: vfio-ap: filter CRYCB bits for unavailable queue devices
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 12:34:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190919123434.28a29c00.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568410018-10833-5-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:26:52 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_get_crycb_matrix(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> +{
> + unsigned long apid, apqi;
> + unsigned long masksz = BITS_TO_LONGS(AP_DEVICES) *
> + sizeof(unsigned long);
> +
> + memset(matrix_mdev->crycb.apm, 0, masksz);
> + memset(matrix_mdev->crycb.apm, 0, masksz);
> + memcpy(matrix_mdev->crycb.adm, matrix_mdev->matrix.adm, masksz);
> +
> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
> + matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max + 1) {
> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
> + matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max + 1) {
> + if (vfio_ap_find_queue(AP_MKQID(apid, apqi))) {
> + if (!test_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->crycb.apm))
> + set_bit_inv(apid,
> + matrix_mdev->crycb.apm);
> + if (!test_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->crycb.aqm))
> + set_bit_inv(apqi,
> + matrix_mdev->crycb.aqm);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
Even with the discussed typo fixed (zero crycb.aqm) this procedure does
not make sense to me. :(
If in doubt please consider the following example:
matrix_mdev->matrix.apm and matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm have both just bits
0 and 1 set (i.e. first byte 0xC0 the rest of the bytes 0x0). Queues
bound to the vfio_ap driver (0,0), (0,1), (1,0); not bound to vfio_ap is
however (1,1). If I read this correctly this filtering logic would grant
access to (1,1) which seems to contradict with the stated intention.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 21:26 [PATCH v6 00/10] s390: vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] s390: vfio-ap: Refactor vfio_ap driver probe and remove callbacks Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] s390: vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP resources to mdev device Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] s390: vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP resources using " Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] s390: vfio-ap: filter CRYCB bits for unavailable queue devices Tony Krowiak
2019-09-18 17:04 ` Halil Pasic
2019-09-18 21:22 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-09-19 10:34 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2019-09-20 14:24 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-09-20 15:44 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest CRYCB Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] s390: vfio-ap: update guest CRYCB in vfio_ap probe and remove callbacks Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] s390: zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] s390: vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] s390: vfio-ap: added versioning to vfio_ap module Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] s390: vfio-ap: update documentation Tony Krowiak
2019-10-08 10:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] s390: vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Halil Pasic
2019-10-08 12:57 ` Pierre Morel
2019-10-15 20:33 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-10-15 20:27 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190919123434.28a29c00.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.