From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F981C4CEC4 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598D320820 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732748AbfIWQ3F (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:29:05 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:39844 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726328AbfIWQ3F (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:29:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8NGHULc139699 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:29:04 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v6yr44qwm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:29:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:29:02 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:28:58 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8NGSvOd50331888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:28:57 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30088AE04D; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:28:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026BAAE055; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:28:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.91.202]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:28:54 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:58:54 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Sasha Levin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , "Naveen N. Rao" , Stephane Eranian , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/31] perf stat: Reset previous counts on repeat with interval Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20190920142542.12047-27-acme@kernel.org> <20190921120623.7B67920717@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190921120623.7B67920717@mail.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19092316-0016-0000-0000-000002AFA5FA X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092316-0017-0000-0000-00003310642B Message-Id: <20190923142314.GA24338@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-23_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909230153 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Sasha, Arnaldo. Between v5.2.16 and acme HEAD, struct perf_evlist to struct evlist and struct perf_evsel to struct evsel. However the patches that I had posted http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190904094738.9558-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com would apply cleanly to v5.2.16. I would like to check if the backports to v5.2.16 should be the same patch (i.e include dependencies including struct renames) or is it okay to apply without the dependencies. Please advise. Because the renames affected a lot of files, it throws up a lot of commits as dependencies. So I would wait for your inputs before I start with the work. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.16, v4.19.74, v4.14.145, v4.9.193, v4.4.193. > > v5.2.16: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 1c839a5a4061 ("perf cs-etm: Configure timestamp generation in CPU-wide mode") > 32dcd021d004 ("perf evsel: Rename struct perf_evsel to struct evsel") > 3399ad9ac234 ("perf cs-etm: Configure contextID tracing in CPU-wide mode") > acae8b36cded ("perf header: Add die information in CPU topology") > b74d8686a18b ("perf cpumap: Retrieve die id information") > db5742b6849e ("perf stat: Support per-die aggregation") > f854839ba2a5 ("perf cpu_map: Rename struct cpu_map to struct perf_cpu_map") > -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju