From: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ext4_iomap_end()
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:50:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190924095044.GB17526@bobrowski> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923162115.GG20367@quack2.suse.cz>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:21:15PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 12-09-19 21:04:00, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > @@ -233,12 +234,90 @@ static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> > return iov_iter_count(from);
> > }
> >
> > +static int ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > + ssize_t len, size_t count)
>
> Traditionally, we call one of the length arguments 'copied' or 'written' to
> denote actual amount of data processed and the original length is called
> 'len' or 'length' in iomap code. Can you please rename the arguments to
> follow this convention?
Sure, I will go with 'written'.
> > +/*
> > + * The inode may have been placed onto the orphan list or has had
> > + * blocks allocated beyond EOF as a result of an extension. We need to
> > + * ensure that any necessary cleanup routines are performed if the
> > + * error path has been taken for a write.
> > + */
> > +static int ext4_handle_failed_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, loff_t size)
> > +{
> > + handle_t *handle;
> > +
> > + if (size > i_size_read(inode))
> > + ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
> > +
> > + if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
> > + handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_INODE, 2);
> > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> > + if (inode->i_nlink)
> > + ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
> > + return PTR_ERR(handle);
> > + }
> > + if (inode->i_nlink)
> > + ext4_orphan_del(handle, inode);
> > + ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> After some thought, I'd just drop this function and fold the functionality
> into ext4_handle_inode_extension() by making it accept negative 'len'
> argument indicating error. The code just happens to be the simplest in that
> case (see below).
>
> > @@ -255,7 +334,18 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> >
> > + offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> > ret = dax_iomap_rw(iocb, from, &ext4_iomap_ops);
> > + if (ret > 0 && iocb->ki_pos > i_size_read(inode))
> > + error = ext4_handle_inode_extension(inode, offset, ret,
> > + iov_iter_count(from));
>
> You need to sample iov_iter_count(from) before calling dax_iomap_rw(). At
> this point iov_iter_count(from) is just what's left in the iter after
> writing what we could.
>
> Also I don't think the condition iocb->ki_pos > i_size_read(inode) is
> correct here. Because it may happen that offset + count > i_size so we
> allocate some blocks beyond i_size but then we manage to copy only less so
> offset + ret == iocb->ki_pos <= i_size and you will not call
> ext4_handle_inode_extension() to truncate allocated blocks beyond i_size.
Yeah, this makes sense. I will implement it this way. Once again, appreciate
your suggestions.
> So I'd just call ext4_handle_inode_extension() unconditionally like:
>
> error = ext4_handle_inode_extension(inode, offset, ret, len);
>
> and have a quick check at the beginning of that function to avoid starting
> transaction when there isn't anything to do. Something like:
>
> /*
> * DIO and DAX writes get exclusion from truncate (i_rwsem) and
> * page writeback (i_rwsem and flushing all dirty pages).
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(i_size_read(inode) != EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize);
> if (offset + count <= i_size_read(inode))
> return 0;
> if (len < 0)
> goto truncate;
>
> ... do the heavylifting with transaction start, inode size update,
> and orphan handling...
>
> if (truncate) {
> truncate:
> ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
> orphan_del:
> /*
> * If the truncate operation failed early the inode
> * may still be on the orphan list. In that case, we
> * need try remove the inode from the linked list in
> * memory.
> */
> if (inode->i_nlink)
> ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
> }
--<M>--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 11:03 [PATCH v3 0/6] ext4: port direct IO to iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-12 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ext4: introduce direct IO read path using " Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-16 12:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-16 13:07 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-12 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ext4_iomap_end() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-23 16:21 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-24 9:50 ` Matthew Bobrowski [this message]
2019-09-24 13:13 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-12 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] iomap: split size and error for iomap_dio_rw ->end_io Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-12 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ext4: reorder map.m_flags checks in ext4_iomap_begin() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-16 12:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-17 12:48 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-23 15:08 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-24 9:35 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-12 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ext4: introduce direct IO write path using iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-16 4:37 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-09-16 10:14 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-16 12:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-16 22:37 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-17 9:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-09-17 9:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-17 10:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-09-17 12:39 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-24 10:57 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-17 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-17 11:31 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-20 13:24 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-23 21:10 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-24 10:29 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-24 14:13 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-25 7:14 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-25 8:40 ` Jan Kara
2019-09-12 11:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ext4: cleanup legacy buffer_head direct IO code Matthew Bobrowski
2019-09-16 12:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-16 12:53 ` Matthew Bobrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190924095044.GB17526@bobrowski \
--to=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.