From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D5EC432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9212D20640 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:06:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9212D20640 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56946 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDYB-0000bk-NX for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:06:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDWx-0008Jb-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:04:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDWu-00010r-2K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:04:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDWt-0000za-TH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:04:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B24CC18CB8EF; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-45.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.116.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4E11001B12; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:04:40 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= Subject: Re: Debian support lifetime (was Re: [PATCH] docker: move tests from python2 to python3) Message-ID: <20190925200440.GO8144@habkost.net> References: <20190920200049.27216-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <20190923145057.GC9445@dhcp-17-179.bos.redhat.com> <6ac39e69-4982-dc35-d853-fedbb1c12e1a@redhat.com> <20190923190533.GR5035@habkost.net> <20190924073513.GA2106@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190924073513.GA2106@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.63]); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, John Snow , Cleber Rosa , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 08:35:13AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrang=E9 wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:05:33PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: [...] > > Even for other long-lifetime distros, I really think "2 years > > after the new major version is released" is too long, and I'd > > like to shorten this to 1 year. >=20 > I guess this is ok, since this. is still quite a long life time of > support for distros. eg RHEL has a 3-4 year gap between major > releases, that gives 4-5 years for each release being supported by > QEMU. Other LTS distros are similar Do you mean the 2 years period is OK (and shouldn't be changed), or that shortening it to 1 year is OK? --=20 Eduardo