From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make is_signed_type() simpler
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:09:08 +0300
Message-ID: <20190929210908.GA14456@avx2>
References: <20190929200619.GA12851@avx2>
 <f99ca43d-1ba2-95fb-b90f-6706a06f8ce6@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f99ca43d-1ba2-95fb-b90f-6706a06f8ce6@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:21:48PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 29/09/2019 22.06, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > * Simply compare -1 with 0,
> > * Drop unnecessary parenthesis sets
> > 
> > -#define is_signed_type(type)       (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> > +#define is_signed_type(type)       ((type)-1 < 0)
> 
> NAK. I wrote it that way to avoid -Wtautological-compare when type is
> unsigned.

Was is W=1?

godbolt doesn't show it with just -Wall

	https://godbolt.org/z/kCA7mm

And the warning which found i915 case is -Wextra not -Wtautological-compare.