From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/kvm: Change print code to use pr_*() format
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:15:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002171551.GC9615@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1569847479-13201-3-git-send-email-zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:44:37PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> pr_*() is preferred than printk(KERN_* ...), after change all the print
> in arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c will have "KVM: xxx" style.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
This wasn't really suggested by Vitaly, he just requested it be done in a
separate patch.
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index a4f108d..ce4f578 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> * Authors: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
> */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "KVM: " fmt
Not a fan of "KVM" as the prefix as it's easily confused with KVM the
hypervisor. Maybe "kvm_guest"?
> +
> #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -286,8 +288,8 @@ static void kvm_register_steal_time(void)
> return;
>
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME, (slow_virt_to_phys(st) | KVM_MSR_ENABLED));
> - pr_info("kvm-stealtime: cpu %d, msr %llx\n",
> - cpu, (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
> + pr_info("stealtime: cpu %d, msr %llx\n", cpu,
> + (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
> }
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
> @@ -321,8 +323,7 @@ static void kvm_guest_cpu_init(void)
>
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, pa);
> __this_cpu_write(apf_reason.enabled, 1);
> - printk(KERN_INFO"KVM setup async PF for cpu %d\n",
> - smp_processor_id());
> + pr_info("setup async PF for cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id());
> }
>
> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
> @@ -347,8 +348,7 @@ static void kvm_pv_disable_apf(void)
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, 0);
> __this_cpu_write(apf_reason.enabled, 0);
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO"Unregister pv shared memory for cpu %d\n",
> - smp_processor_id());
> + pr_info("Unregister pv shared memory for cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id());
> }
>
> static void kvm_pv_guest_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static void kvm_setup_pv_ipi(void)
> {
> apic->send_IPI_mask = kvm_send_ipi_mask;
> apic->send_IPI_mask_allbutself = kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself;
> - pr_info("KVM setup pv IPIs\n");
> + pr_info("setup pv IPIs\n");
> }
>
> static void kvm_smp_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask)
> @@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
> !kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME) &&
> kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME)) {
> smp_ops.send_call_func_ipi = kvm_smp_send_call_func_ipi;
> - pr_info("KVM setup pv sched yield\n");
> + pr_info("setup pv sched yield\n");
> }
> if (cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/kvm:online",
> kvm_cpu_online, kvm_cpu_down_prepare) < 0)
> - pr_err("kvm_guest: Failed to install cpu hotplug callbacks\n");
> + pr_err("failed to install cpu hotplug callbacks\n");
> #else
> sev_map_percpu_data();
> kvm_guest_cpu_init();
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static __init int kvm_setup_pv_tlb_flush(void)
> zalloc_cpumask_var_node(per_cpu_ptr(&__pv_tlb_mask, cpu),
> GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> }
> - pr_info("KVM setup pv remote TLB flush\n");
> + pr_info("setup pv remote TLB flush\n");
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -879,8 +879,8 @@ static void kvm_enable_host_haltpoll(void *i)
> void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_POLL_CONTROL)) {
> - pr_err_once("kvm: host does not support poll control\n");
> - pr_err_once("kvm: host upgrade recommended\n");
> + pr_err_once("host does not support poll control\n");
> + pr_err_once("host upgrade recommended\n");
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 12:44 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add a unified parameter "nopvspin" Zhenzhong Duan
2019-09-30 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/kvm: Add "nopvspin" parameter to disable PV spinlocks Zhenzhong Duan
2019-10-02 17:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-03 10:30 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2019-09-30 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/kvm: Change print code to use pr_*() format Zhenzhong Duan
2019-10-02 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-10-03 10:32 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2019-09-30 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] xen: Mark "xen_nopvspin" parameter obsolete and map it to "nopvspin" Zhenzhong Duan
2019-10-02 17:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-03 11:21 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2019-09-30 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/hyperv: Mark "hv_nopvspin" " Zhenzhong Duan
2019-10-02 17:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-03 11:22 ` Zhenzhong Duan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191002171551.GC9615@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.