From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:53585 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727222AbfJBUne (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:43:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id i16so306455wmd.3 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:43:26 +0100 From: Matthias Maennich Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] module: various bug-fixes and clean-ups for module namespace Message-ID: <20191002204326.GA178871@google.com> References: <20190927093603.9140-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20190927134108.GC187147@google.com> <20191002185701.GA29041@linux-8ccs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191002185701.GA29041@linux-8ccs> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jessica Yu Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joel Fernandes , Martijn Coenen , Will Deacon , Michal Marek , Will Deacon , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote: >+++ Matthias Maennich [27/09/19 14:41 +0100]: >>On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 06:35:56PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>> >>>I was hit by some problems caused by the module namespace feature >>>that was merged recently. At least, the breakage of >>>external module builds is a fatal one. I just took a look at the code >>>closer, and I noticed some more issues and improvements. >>> >>>I hope these patches are mostly OK. >>>The 4th patch might have room for argument since it is a trade-off >>>of "cleaner implermentation" vs "code size". >>> >>Thanks Masahiro for taking the time to improve the implementation of the >>symbol namespaces. These are all good points that you addressed! > >Agreed, thanks Masahiro for fixing up all the rough edges! Your series >of fixes look good to me, I will queue this up on modules-next this >week with the exception of patch 4 - Matthias, you are planning to >submit a patch that would supercede patch 04/07, right? I will most likely create a patch on top of 04/07 and will submit everything as a separate series. Cheers, Matthias