From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] timer fix
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 00:06:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002220607.GA50607@gmail.com> (raw)
Linus,
Please pull the latest timers-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git timers-urgent-for-linus
# HEAD: b9023b91dd020ad7e093baa5122b6968c48cc9e0 tick: broadcast-hrtimer: Fix a race in bc_set_next
Fix a broadcast-timer handling race that can result in spuriously and
indefinitely delayed hrtimers and even RCU stalls if the system is
otherwise quiet.
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Balasubramani Vivekanandan (1):
tick: broadcast-hrtimer: Fix a race in bc_set_next
kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
index c1f5bb590b5e..b5a65e212df2 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
@@ -42,39 +42,39 @@ static int bc_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
*/
static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
{
- int bc_moved;
/*
- * We try to cancel the timer first. If the callback is on
- * flight on some other cpu then we let it handle it. If we
- * were able to cancel the timer nothing can rearm it as we
- * own broadcast_lock.
+ * This is called either from enter/exit idle code or from the
+ * broadcast handler. In all cases tick_broadcast_lock is held.
*
- * However we can also be called from the event handler of
- * ce_broadcast_hrtimer itself when it expires. We cannot
- * restart the timer because we are in the callback, but we
- * can set the expiry time and let the callback return
- * HRTIMER_RESTART.
+ * hrtimer_cancel() cannot be called here neither from the
+ * broadcast handler nor from the enter/exit idle code. The idle
+ * code can run into the problem described in bc_shutdown() and the
+ * broadcast handler cannot wait for itself to complete for obvious
+ * reasons.
*
- * Since we are in the idle loop at this point and because
- * hrtimer_{start/cancel} functions call into tracing,
- * calls to these functions must be bound within RCU_NONIDLE.
+ * Each caller tries to arm the hrtimer on its own CPU, but if the
+ * hrtimer callbback function is currently running, then
+ * hrtimer_start() cannot move it and the timer stays on the CPU on
+ * which it is assigned at the moment.
+ *
+ * As this can be called from idle code, the hrtimer_start()
+ * invocation has to be wrapped with RCU_NONIDLE() as
+ * hrtimer_start() can call into tracing.
*/
- RCU_NONIDLE(
- {
- bc_moved = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0;
- if (bc_moved) {
- hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires,
- HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_HARD);
- }
- }
- );
-
- if (bc_moved) {
- /* Bind the "device" to the cpu */
- bc->bound_on = smp_processor_id();
- } else if (bc->bound_on == smp_processor_id()) {
- hrtimer_set_expires(&bctimer, expires);
- }
+ RCU_NONIDLE( {
+ hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_HARD);
+ /*
+ * The core tick broadcast mode expects bc->bound_on to be set
+ * correctly to prevent a CPU which has the broadcast hrtimer
+ * armed from going deep idle.
+ *
+ * As tick_broadcast_lock is held, nothing can change the cpu
+ * base which was just established in hrtimer_start() above. So
+ * the below access is safe even without holding the hrtimer
+ * base lock.
+ */
+ bc->bound_on = bctimer.base->cpu_base->cpu;
+ } );
return 0;
}
@@ -100,10 +100,6 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart bc_handler(struct hrtimer *t)
{
ce_broadcast_hrtimer.event_handler(&ce_broadcast_hrtimer);
- if (clockevent_state_oneshot(&ce_broadcast_hrtimer))
- if (ce_broadcast_hrtimer.next_event != KTIME_MAX)
- return HRTIMER_RESTART;
-
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 22:06 Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-10-02 23:00 ` [GIT PULL] timer fix pr-tracker-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-18 20:34 Ingo Molnar
2025-04-18 21:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-06-15 8:05 Ingo Molnar
2024-06-15 18:38 ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-05-10 11:12 Ingo Molnar
2024-05-10 17:29 ` pr-tracker-bot
2020-06-28 18:39 Ingo Molnar
2020-06-28 22:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
2020-04-25 10:16 Ingo Molnar
2020-04-25 19:30 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-11-16 21:38 Ingo Molnar
2019-11-17 0:35 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-09-26 20:18 Ingo Molnar
2019-09-26 23:00 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-04-12 13:09 Ingo Molnar
2019-04-13 4:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
2018-12-21 12:34 Ingo Molnar
2018-12-21 19:30 ` pr-tracker-bot
2018-12-23 19:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-01-17 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-01-17 15:58 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-01-17 16:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-25 9:00 Ingo Molnar
2017-09-24 11:25 Ingo Molnar
2017-08-26 7:17 Ingo Molnar
2017-07-21 10:21 Ingo Molnar
2017-05-12 7:35 Ingo Molnar
2017-01-18 9:37 Ingo Molnar
2016-12-23 22:53 Ingo Molnar
2016-10-18 11:18 Ingo Molnar
2016-07-13 12:58 Ingo Molnar
2016-04-23 11:34 Ingo Molnar
2015-08-14 7:13 Ingo Molnar
2015-07-18 3:06 Ingo Molnar
2015-02-06 18:38 Ingo Molnar
2014-03-29 18:44 Ingo Molnar
2014-01-15 18:27 Ingo Molnar
2013-10-26 12:27 Ingo Molnar
2013-09-18 16:22 Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 1:39 Linux 3.1-rc9 Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 14:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 14:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-18 18:14 ` [GIT PULL] timer fix Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 18:11 Ingo Molnar
2011-02-28 17:39 Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 17:06 Ingo Molnar
2010-01-31 17:26 Ingo Molnar
2009-10-02 12:38 Ingo Molnar
2009-09-26 12:27 Ingo Molnar
2009-08-09 16:09 Ingo Molnar
2009-08-04 19:04 Ingo Molnar
2009-06-20 16:55 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-17 16:38 [git pull] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 19:25 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-05 0:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 7:51 ` Kirill Korotaev
2009-02-05 9:58 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-02-05 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 16:04 ` Ray Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191002220607.GA50607@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.