From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: julien.grall@arm.com
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, andrii_anisov@epam.com,
Achin.Gupta@arm.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 4/8] xen/arm: copy dtb fragment to guest dtb
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:35:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003013526.30768-4-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910021833180.2691@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s>
Read the dtb fragment corresponding to a passthrough device from memory
at the location referred to by the "multiboot,device-tree" compatible
node.
Add a new field named dtb_bootmodule to struct kernel_info to keep track
of the dtb fragment location.
Copy the fragment to the guest dtb (only /aliases and /passthrough).
Set kinfo->phandle_gic based on the phandle of the special "/gic"
node in the device tree fragment. "/gic" is a dummy node in the dtb
fragment that represents the gic interrupt controller. Other properties
in the dtb fragment might refer to it (for instance interrupt-parent of
a device node). We reuse the phandle of "/gic" from the dtb fragment as
the phandle of the full GIC node that will be created for the guest
device tree. That way, when we copy properties from the device tree
fragment to the domU device tree the links remain unbroken.
scan_passthrough_prop is introduced here and not used in this patch but
it will be used by later patches.
Some of the code below is taken from tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c. Note that
it is OK to take LGPL 2.1 code and including it into a GPLv2 code base.
The result is GPLv2 code.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
----
Changes in v6:
- code style
- in-code comment
- commit message improvements
Changes in v5:
- code style
- in-code comment
- remove depth parameter from scan_pfdt_node
- for instead of loop in domain_handle_dtb_bootmodule
- move "gic" check to domain_handle_dtb_bootmodule
- add check_partial_fdt
- use DT_ROOT_NODE_ADDR/SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT
- add scan_passthrough_prop parameter, set it to false for "/aliases"
Changes in v4:
- use recursion in the implementation
- rename handle_properties to handle_prop_pfdt
- rename scan_pt_node to scan_pfdt_node
- pass kinfo to handle_properties
- use uint32_t instead of u32
- rename r to res
- add "passthrough" and "aliases" check
- add a name == NULL check
- code style
- move DTB fragment scanning earlier, before DomU GIC node creation
- set guest_phandle_gic based on "/gic"
- in-code comment
Changes in v3:
- switch to using device_tree_for_each_node for the copy
Changes in v2:
- add a note about the code coming from libxl in the commit message
- copy /aliases
- code style
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index d23c0a9b87..84b65b8f25 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <xen/guest_access.h>
#include <xen/iocap.h>
#include <xen/acpi.h>
+#include <xen/vmap.h>
#include <xen/warning.h>
#include <acpi/actables.h>
#include <asm/device.h>
@@ -1713,6 +1714,157 @@ static int __init make_vpl011_uart_node(struct kernel_info *kinfo)
}
#endif
+static int __init handle_prop_pfdt(struct kernel_info *kinfo,
+ const void *pfdt, int nodeoff,
+ uint32_t address_cells, uint32_t size_cells,
+ bool scan_passthrough_prop)
+{
+ void *fdt = kinfo->fdt;
+ int propoff, nameoff, res;
+ const struct fdt_property *prop;
+
+ for ( propoff = fdt_first_property_offset(pfdt, nodeoff);
+ propoff >= 0;
+ propoff = fdt_next_property_offset(pfdt, propoff) )
+ {
+ if ( !(prop = fdt_get_property_by_offset(pfdt, propoff, NULL)) )
+ return -FDT_ERR_INTERNAL;
+
+ nameoff = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->nameoff);
+ res = fdt_property(fdt, fdt_string(pfdt, nameoff),
+ prop->data, fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len));
+ if ( res )
+ return res;
+ }
+
+ /* FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND => There is no more properties for this node */
+ return ( propoff != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND ) ? propoff : 0;
+}
+
+static int __init scan_pfdt_node(struct kernel_info *kinfo, const void *pfdt,
+ int nodeoff,
+ uint32_t address_cells, uint32_t size_cells,
+ bool scan_passthrough_prop)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+ void *fdt = kinfo->fdt;
+ int node_next;
+
+ rc = fdt_begin_node(fdt, fdt_get_name(pfdt, nodeoff, NULL));
+ if ( rc )
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = handle_prop_pfdt(kinfo, pfdt, nodeoff, address_cells, size_cells,
+ scan_passthrough_prop);
+ if ( rc )
+ return rc;
+
+ address_cells = device_tree_get_u32(pfdt, nodeoff, "#address-cells",
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT);
+ size_cells = device_tree_get_u32(pfdt, nodeoff, "#size-cells",
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT);
+
+ node_next = fdt_first_subnode(pfdt, nodeoff);
+ while ( node_next > 0 )
+ {
+ scan_pfdt_node(kinfo, pfdt, node_next, address_cells, size_cells,
+ scan_passthrough_prop);
+ node_next = fdt_next_subnode(pfdt, node_next);
+ }
+
+ return fdt_end_node(fdt);
+}
+
+static int __init check_partial_fdt(void *pfdt, size_t size)
+{
+ int res;
+
+ if ( fdt_magic(pfdt) != FDT_MAGIC )
+ {
+ dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Partial FDT is not a valid Flat Device Tree");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ res = fdt_check_header(pfdt);
+ if ( res )
+ {
+ dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Failed to check the partial FDT (%d)", res);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if ( fdt_totalsize(pfdt) > size )
+ {
+ dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Partial FDT totalsize is too big");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init domain_handle_dtb_bootmodule(struct domain *d,
+ struct kernel_info *kinfo)
+{
+ void *pfdt;
+ int res, node_next;
+
+ pfdt = ioremap_cache(kinfo->dtb_bootmodule->start,
+ kinfo->dtb_bootmodule->size);
+ if ( pfdt == NULL )
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ res = check_partial_fdt(pfdt, kinfo->dtb_bootmodule->size);
+ if ( res < 0 )
+ return res;
+
+ for ( node_next = fdt_first_subnode(pfdt, 0);
+ node_next > 0;
+ node_next = fdt_next_subnode(pfdt, node_next) )
+ {
+ const char *name = fdt_get_name(pfdt, node_next, NULL);
+
+ if ( name == NULL )
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Only scan /gic /aliases /passthrough, ignore the rest.
+ * They don't have to be parsed in order.
+ *
+ * Take the GIC phandle value from the special /gic node in the
+ * DTB fragment.
+ */
+ if ( dt_node_cmp(name, "gic") == 0 )
+ {
+ kinfo->phandle_gic = fdt_get_phandle(pfdt, node_next);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if ( dt_node_cmp(name, "aliases") == 0 )
+ {
+ res = scan_pfdt_node(kinfo, pfdt, node_next,
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT,
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT,
+ false);
+ if ( res )
+ return res;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if ( dt_node_cmp(name, "passthrough") == 0 )
+ {
+ res = scan_pfdt_node(kinfo, pfdt, node_next,
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT,
+ DT_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT,
+ true);
+ if ( res )
+ return res;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ iounmap(pfdt);
+
+ return res;
+}
+
/*
* The max size for DT is 2MB. However, the generated DT is small, 4KB
* are enough for now, but we might have to increase it in the future.
@@ -1768,6 +1920,18 @@ static int __init prepare_dtb_domU(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo)
if ( ret )
goto err;
+ /*
+ * domain_handle_dtb_bootmodule has to be called before the rest of
+ * the device tree is generated because it depends on the value of
+ * the field phandle_gic.
+ */
+ if ( kinfo->dtb_bootmodule )
+ {
+ ret = domain_handle_dtb_bootmodule(d, kinfo);
+ if ( ret )
+ return ret;
+ }
+
ret = make_gic_domU_node(kinfo);
if ( ret )
goto err;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
index 43fa87545e..874aa108a7 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/kernel.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct kernel_info {
paddr_t gnttab_size;
/* boot blob load addresses */
- const struct bootmodule *kernel_bootmodule, *initrd_bootmodule;
+ const struct bootmodule *kernel_bootmodule, *initrd_bootmodule, *dtb_bootmodule;
const char* cmdline;
paddr_t dtb_paddr;
paddr_t initrd_paddr;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-03 1:35 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 0/8] dom0less device assignment Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 1/8] xen/arm: introduce handle_device_interrupts Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/8] xen/arm: export device_tree_get_reg and device_tree_get_u32 Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 3/8] xen/arm: introduce kinfo->phandle_gic Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 5/8] xen/arm: assign devices to boot domains Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 9:34 ` Julien Grall
2019-10-03 17:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 9:51 ` Julien Grall
2019-10-03 17:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 6/8] xen/arm: handle "multiboot, device-tree" compatible nodes Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 7/8] xen/arm: introduce nr_spis Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 1:35 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 8/8] xen/arm: add dom0-less device assignment info to docs Stefano Stabellini
2019-10-03 9:36 ` Julien Grall
2019-10-03 9:58 ` Julien Grall
2019-10-03 17:36 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191003013526.30768-4-sstabellini@kernel.org \
--to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=Achin.Gupta@arm.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrii_anisov@epam.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.