From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9171939476443529473==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Florian Westphal To: mptcp at lists.01.org Subject: [MPTCP] Re: RFCv2 for netdev: what's missing? Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20191003074627.GD13866@breakpoint.cc> In-Reply-To: alpine.OSX.2.21.1910021737190.33041@syitbare-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2007 --===============9171939476443529473== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mat Martineau wrote: > > Regenerating those and resending. Sorry! > > = > = > Based on Dave's feedback, it looked like a bad idea to repost the correct= 43 > patches today. Yes, I agree it was good to not send it. > Sorry again about the error on my part, we can discuss how to > partition the patch series (and possibly squash some more patches) at the > meeting tomorrow. Unfortunately I won't make the meeting today. I would suggest to make another RFC submission on Friday or Monday, consisting only of the non-mptcp patches, i.e.: net: Make sock protocol value checks more specific sock: Make sk_protocol a 16-bit value tcp: Define IPPROTO_MPTCP tcp, ulp: Add clone operation to tcp_ulp_ops tcp: Prevent coalesce/collapse when skb has MPTCP extensions tcp: Export low-level TCP functions tcp: Check for filled TCP option space before SACK tcp: clean ext on tx recycle tcp: Expose tcp struct and routine for MPTCP Wrt to = tcp: clean ext on tx recycle I think this is in fact a bug fix, I think this should call both skb_ext_reset+nf_reset_ct. (I am not 100% sure the nf_ct pointer is always cleared already on skbs that we put back on per sk cache). Same for secpath. Cheers, Florian --===============9171939476443529473==--