diff for duplicates of <20191003181938.GJ87296@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2c27e10..e4fcb2e 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -43,3 +43,8 @@ Looks like cpufreq does the same, but I'm not convinced this is a good
 idea. I think we want to display the values set by userspace, as done
 before managing the limits through PM QoS. Viresh, was this change of
 userspace visible behavior done intentionally for cpufreq?
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f1baa25..007bbab 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,21 +5,21 @@
  "Date\0Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:19:38 -0700\0"
  "To\0Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>"
  " Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>"
-  MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
-  Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
- " Artur \305\232wigo\305\204 <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>"
+ "Cc\0Artur \305\232wigo\305\204 <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>"
+  Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
+  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
+  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
+  NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
+  Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
+  Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
+  Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
+  MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
   Alexandre Bailon <abailon@baylibre.com>
   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
-  Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
-  Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
-  Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-  Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
-  NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
-  linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+ " Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:25:09PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:\n"
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@
  "Looks like cpufreq does the same, but I'm not convinced this is a good\n"
  "idea. I think we want to display the values set by userspace, as done\n"
  "before managing the limits through PM QoS. Viresh, was this change of\n"
- userspace visible behavior done intentionally for cpufreq?
+ "userspace visible behavior done intentionally for cpufreq?\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-4628867ddebcd957630d2e409882218c4ab00e9dc4d0850122a6a54d0373e855
+1bde94890574a488f18a34723e10daf4d74b8b3e89c51f8c05fccff3e543698c
